Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
eric_schimelpfenig EDU
Reactions
-
Re: Suggestions on approach for fully parametric model
Ok, I've had some time to fool with this more and I think I'm honing in on a good workflow here: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/c8e505f1a9fd03ee50066c27/w/f7f3d2dbcefb2407d741fc15/e/0c3c739c3cb164… (View Post)1 -
Re: Suggestions on approach for fully parametric model
In this example it's simple and I totally get what you're saying. The real X legs, just the two legs themselves are 39 features. So far one stretcher is 26. So I sorta did what you said but in a diff… (View Post)1 -
Re: Suggestions on approach for fully parametric model
Thanks again @owen_sparks this is all starting to gel for me. I'm re-working this design now. Here's a sample milling job: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsJ9xcFYMEM&t=165s Normally when I make … (View Post)5 -
Re: Suggestions on approach for fully parametric model
Hey all! Sorry for the long delay, I got busy working on some other projects. I did a big update based on what I learned from you all. Rather than type out a big novel, I captured it in this video: h… (View Post)2 -
Re: Suggestions on approach for fully parametric model
Wow @owen_sparks thanks so much for digging in! I'm really torn about the right solution here.... I went back and re-worked my crate so that I had each unique part in a separate part studio. This had… (View Post)1
