Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
jon_30 ✭✭
Reactions
-
Re: Onshape Needs Its Own CAM
By now it should be clear to anyone who makes good use of this board that you won't see Mastercam running inside of Onshape anytime soon. That leaves SolidCAM as the only Onshape CAM partner I know o… (View Post)-2 -
Onshape Needs Its Own CAM
Integrated CAM within SolidWorks has never lived up to the hype because both CAD and CAM really need to share the same database. Using a CAD systems API hasn't worked out very well and I no longer be… (View Post)-8 -
Re: Forget the Parametry
"I do wish that Onshape had started DM because I'm more of a DM fan and if their effort was put into DM from the beginning I can only imagine how excellent it would be moving forward!" What… (View Post)-2 -
Re: Forget the Parametry
Siemens Synchronous Technology is not part of the Parasolid kernel. It's separate and Siemens doesn't license it. Siemens does a lousy job of explaining what Synchronous Technology in Solid Edge actu… (View Post)1 -
Re: Forget the Parametry
The real reason we need parametric modeling is because no one has developed a user interface that makes direct modeling work well with family of parts. SpaceClaim might have been able to do it if the… (View Post)-2