Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Why is my circular pattern not defined?
Re: Why is my circular pattern not defined?
S1mon
Re: Tangent Mate is bistable (and I don't need it to be)
I also fully agree. A tangent mate in a 3D model (maybe other than in a sketch) could refer to surface normals in order to make a tangent mate stable by default. That is what I would expect.
Re: Perforate a cylindrical shape
Hey Mark. Here is a method you might be able to use to perforate your part. Playing around with the shape (shapes?) in sketch 1 might get what you want. The Circular Pattern feature allows the removal of pattern instances should the pattern fall upon an edge of the part, which I assume would be undesirable.
Beyond using Onshape's native tools. Evan Reese created a custom feature you might be able to use. Check out this post for a discussion, link to the feature script and a video of using the feature script. - Scotty
Re: Best approach for complex surface shape - Loft/Sweep/Bridging Curve/ other?
@S1mon @jelte_steur_info
thank you both for the really good feedback. I was able to (after quite a bit more hours of work) a workable copy. However, I am going to review your sketch Jelte and see how you did it.
I am having issues understanding the sketches not being constrained. I was under the impression that once the shape snaps are used, and the sketch enclosed, or finished, it is constrained. I must be mis-understanding how to lock its contents in.
nonetheless, thank you both greatly!
Re: Best approach for complex surface shape - Loft/Sweep/Bridging Curve/ other?
I think something along these lines is how the part is built up.
In general: please make sure sketches (like sketch 7) are fully constrained. the lack of tangency/concentricity etc is causing downstream issues quite quickly:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/ccb37699191c84712fb79624/w/823c67f8bc41e015beb37e33/e/23b5ff33b5e667de837a2c93


