Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: Can robust complex surfaces be modelled.
@Nick_Holzem. I might borrow this Primary, Intermediate and final practice. Because I've seen designers jump to intermediate and the tool makers go, oh you have to change those edges etc. It in my eyes creates an unnecessary loop and brings a risk of the wrong file going to final. It's funny you mention this, as I was just yesterday talking with one of the designers about getting decisions made on intentionally incomplete designs. Don't polish a design that was bound to be rejected anyway. Better to do 10 stage 1 designs and get direction than it is to to show 3 final ready designs that are all rejected. There seems to be a culture of waterfall project management and perfect deliveries, whereas I guess you are working in a more agile approach at Trek.
Thanks for the feedback on the training. Advance surfacing excellency is something on the to do list. I was watching @EvanReese's video @Matt_Shields posted earlier, surfacing excellency is a deeper topic that had anticipated. I've heard many comments that packaging doesn't need A class surfacing. Which I disagree with.
