Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Engineering Change Notices / New Part Introductions & OnShape
I'm currently working on our ECN process and NPI process and would love to know how any of you, specifically at smaller businesses have integrated OnShape with your process.
Our current process is very rudimentary, a google sheet and doc that we fill out manually and send out. Is there a better way? Suggestions?
Re: Internal Threads
This feature is limited as there's no way to create a symmetrical 'THRU ALL' cut.
(one could possibly create a plain 'pilot' hole using 'symmetrical' option & then IF there was 'internal' thread command…use it, which is why we're all asking I suppose)
Onshape:
In 2010, Solid Edge paid several million dollars for consultants to review the software with an eye on driving down mouse travel/clicks & general efficiency. The release that resulted was THE most useful & fruitful update to that point as it benefited every user.

Re: ThreadLab - Internal/External Modeled/Cosmetic Threads with External Thread Callouts
I'm fairly new with the thread lab tool. I use it for internal threads but I have to remember to override the diameter of the hole that the onshape hole feature creates because thread labs adds geometry to the face of the hole instead of cutting it out like a tap. Thankfully I use mostly metric threads and don't have to look up the diameter every time.

Re: ThreadLab - Internal/External Modeled/Cosmetic Threads with External Thread Callouts
@antlu65 no apology necessary! You don't owe us! Thanks for making the tool. It's great work.
I personally use the tool for printed threads. Printing the threads into a part down to M3x.5 is really reliable and tends to be a lot like its own nylok nut. I generally have found my only wish to be the chamfering functionality I mentioned above.
With Onshape implementing external cosmetic threads as time has gone on, I don't know if or when the last time I used it within threadlab. There's of course this feature request:
I'm not sure what progress there is on that front though.
I'd really appreciate it if they'd put the same effect in the models that is in the drawings but we've all got to take what we get. They're always cooking back there.
Thanks again for all your hard work. I looked into the featurescript and it sure looks like a ton of effort went into it.
Re: ThreadLab - Internal/External Modeled/Cosmetic Threads with External Thread Callouts
Appreciate everyone leaving feedback - apologies for not being in touch and not actively developing this. If I picked this project up again, I would re-write it with fewer 'accessory' features (e.g. thread callout, cosmetic threads, etc) and focus on modeled threads. @john_hauck's detailed post is especially instructive.
@michael_zeagler , @Oliver_Couch , @MDesign , or anyone interested,
Could you offer any comments on how your use cases align (or differ) with what @john_hauck described in his post? What are the most important features you would want to use in a modeled thread feature?

Re: Want your assembly & logo highlighted on cad.onshape.com?
@sebastian_glanzner You should submit PIB! Would be pretty sick on display.
Re: How would one make these twists on twists?
I would use the 3d spiral FS.
However, are you sure you need model every strand in there? That will make your model really slow and I'm not sure what the value is…
Re: Configuration properties - Part number not showing in assembly BOM
Hi,
thank you all for the answers and suggestions the problem is on me. I forgot that I have configuration variable and the value I used in the Property configuration was not default and I inserted instances with default values. When I changed conf. var to the right value everything played as it suppose to.
The good thing of my mishap is the response of the Mr. Pascoe where I learned of a very nice Feature Script, thank you for this.
Best regards,
Nenad
Re: Sketch on Mate Connector
Do you need the MC in the final feature? You could just apply the transform to upperMC cSys, then use plane(cSys).
Otherwise, try:
var newSketchMC = evMateConnector(context, { "mateConnector" : qCreatedBy(id + "mateConnector1", EntityType.BODY) }); const sketchUpperID = id + "upperBore"; const upperBore = newSketchOnPlane(context, id + "sketch1", { "sketchPlane" : plane(newSketchMC) });
Flattening a loft surface
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3802d6ef9725ce6f8d67f83a/w/c3076b2caa69d75323d9ef22/e/0cef65930fd5c5fa8b5526cf
Basically what I want to achieve is to make plans for sawing parts from flat plywood sheets so that they can be curved into the shapes of the model in the link above.
As far as I have understood from other posts on this forum, there is no functionality in onshape to flatten parts that are curved in 3 dimensions.
Is there any plans to add "unfolding" for these types of surfaces to onshape in the future?
Does anyone have a process to do this using some other tool (I'm thinking exporting a part from onshape, flattening it and import the flattened part back to onshape)?
Perhaps there is some math trick to calculate an approximation of the flat shape from the curved part?
Thanks!