Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Improvements to Onshape - November 1st, 2022
Comments
-
-
I want to mention other small improvement added:
Allow multiple users to simultaneously view Drawings in publications
See Changelog
Un saludo,
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común4 -
OK, that's clear now. Thank you John.john_rousseau said:
We spent several months (a few years ago) dealing with spammers that were abusing our high-reputation email service on Free and Education accounts to send ads. The only successful mitigation was to remove the ability to set a custom message on easily acquired accounts.Henk_de_Vlaam said:But... is the personal message function in the Share panel not possible for the Free and Education plan? I don't see it.1 -
0
-
For the surfacing improvement with the "adjacant faces": what situations are these actually useful for? the example on the bike frame just shows extra work required, but doesn't clarify what problem this improvement is solving. (I have some idea's but would love to hear from the OS team that created this)
kind regards
0 -
That's what I thought when I first saw that example, but apparently that surface won't build without it on that model.jelte_steur814 said:For the surfacing improvement with the "adjacant faces": what situations are these actually useful for? the example on the bike frame just shows extra work required, but doesn't clarify what problem this improvement is solving. (I have some idea's but would love to hear from the OS team that created this)
kind regards
If the tube was solid, there would be two faces that could be used for tangency, so this allows you to select which one to use. Also, if you are using a curve or sketch entity, you can select an "unconnected" surface for continuity.Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEA3 -

14 -
External threads! Very exciting.
Is it possible to add a checkbox within the threading features to enable/disable rendering threads in 3D on the part? I get that it can slow things down and isn't needed often, but it would be a very useful feature for exporting parts to be 3D printed. Alternatively, it could just be an option when exporting parts to fully render threads or not.
1 -
I agree with @amir_livne - Why not simulation for education? Simulation is fantastic for education.3
-
The Onshape team would probably love to offer Simulation to students. Consider that there are 1.8M student accounts, which are virtually free. Running a simulation takes processor time, which has a cost. If you open the flood gates, Onshape could suddenly have millions of Simulations running
Free Onshape for students is wonderful. There are 582 Onshape accounts at my school alone. Setting up and administering an international PDM on that scale would be a big undertaking. Onshape does it effortlessly; students get the best of CAD without the barriers and distractions of traditional CAD8 -
Despite the fact that I have only students 50 students I absolutely agree with Ian_d_gardine and I really hope that Onshape will release the simulation for students as well2
-
For simulation with schools there is Onscale and if you need more (wind tunnels, CFD etc) Simscale also has a free tier and they both integrate with onshape.Engineering textbook: https://hwh.stephenteacher.com/txtbook.html1
-
External thread is a huge disappointment. Why even make it if it's only for call out in drawing, but technically not visible / present?1
-
Totally agree with you. It is not good news not being able to work with our students features like FEA, PCB design or Render.amir_livne said:Hi
External Thread - That's great !!!!
Simulation - As a college lecture I'm very sad to hear that the simulation mode is not available in "Onshape Education". My students are one step before they'll enter to the real industry life and I cannot introduce them to that simulation. As you all know, that mode is part of "Solidworks Education". I'm wondering why ????
Amir Livneh
2









