Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: NEW Custom Feature: Thread Decal
Aw shucks. Thanks Simon!
You know I'd love if decals could be a bump map, which would render these a bit better, and be handy to represent textures. I had to just make a believable-ish shaded thread image.
Re: Sheet metal performance best practices
Oh, in my case I couldn't break up my model even if I wanted to. My main chassis was all one piece of sheetmetal 6 feet tall and 3 feet wide with hundreds of holes in it for PEM fasteners, rivets, etc.
Re: Sheet metal performance best practices
I've found sheetmetal to be slow as molasses on a few projects I worked on. Disappointing for sure. Creo would hardly ever bog down on anything. Maybe it is that parasolid kernal, I have no idea. I know Creo uses its own kernal from the late 80's I guess. What I did that helped a lot was "finish" the sheetmetal model immediately after the main shape with bends was all finished. Then, put the holes/slots/etc afterwards. This removes them from the flat pattern and speeds regeneration. I found the vendors don't want a flat pattern anyway, they unfold the step model in their own software. Also now, hobby places like sendcutsend accept step files (before they only accepted flat pattern dxf).
Re: NEW Custom Feature: Thread Decal
That's awesome.
I shall be encouraging my students to use this.
Re: NEW Custom Feature: Thread Decal
Once again, @EvanReese creates a custom feature that should be a standard part of Onshape.

Re: Sheet metal performance best practices
Yeah the trick is finding the right balance.
Top down design with layout sketches derived into multiple part studios is going to be the most efficient in terms of regen times but just making the mating parts in a single part studio is the easiest/quickest (until it gets too slow to regen).
Deriving active sheet metal parts now at least allows starting with everything in a part studio and "parting it out" at a later point to add details as a mitigation strategy.
Re: Mounting Boss FeatureScript
Hi @ry_gb
Thanks for reporting this. I'm glad you've found it helpful.
I'm a little busy at the moment, but I'll dig into it as soon as I can and try to get it fixed.
Re: Sheet metal performance best practices
Without seeing the actual model it's hard to tell. Perhaps the holes may be trying to check the scope between a bunch of parts. If you explicitly tell the hole feature to only intersect the part(s) you want, does that help?

Re: Sheet metal performance best practices
I've run into this quite a bit…
My plan for the next project is to make use of the "derive" feature for active sheet metal parts. Create only the key "shared" geometry of your parts in a part studio and then "finish" the parts in their own part studio after deriving them in.
Re: Help! I cant seem to find out how to modify an ellipse how I want
Thanks for the help with this! After I posted this about 20 minutes more of playing I found the spline which was exactly what was going on. I should have recognized the mirror sooner as the other lines didn't have dimensions.