Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Is it possible to disable the automatic "suggestions" for the merge scope of a hole?
When I add a hole, OnShape will auto-populate the merge scope of that hole. Sometimes this is useful, other times it extends the merge of the hole well beyond what I want it to be, which can be frustrating to have to delete multiple items from the merge scope list when I just want the hole to go all the way through one or two parts, not every part that hole could theoretically touch in a continuous straight line.
Further, there have been multiple times where I've gone in to edit the parameters/dimensions/etc of a hole, and after making those edits, the merge scope changes itself to include more parts. This is incredibly frustrating and has led to multiple instances where that change in merge scope causes problems in other parts that I don't catch until much later into the design process (one time after a small edit request by a machinist almost led to a catastrophe when that hole change edited multiple parts it wasn't previously set to edit).
Is there a way to turn this off? I'd much rather just have to manually select the relevant parts every time I make a hole instead of risking these problems.
Re: Please add all 1710 Google Fonts to onShape
Good fonts cost money (assuming you license them properly).
Fonts designed for 2D printing don't immediately translate to Onshape for 3D NURBS modeling based on Parasolid. There are many cases where fonts have shapes touching at points or paths that overlap. These issues cause problems with extruding glyphs. It takes time and effort to tune a font for use in mechanical CAD.
It's easier for Onshape to focus on ME CAD stuff and let users export and fix stuff out of Illustrator or Inkscape or whatever.
Would it be nice to have more good fonts for Onshape, yes. Is this not happening because Onshape is being lazy or doesn't care, no.

Re: Please add all 1710 Google Fonts to onShape

Re: Engineering Change Notices / New Part Introductions & OnShape
Currently, for our internal ECN and NPI processes, we really only use the Released management fuctions but have two custom properties: one for "Approvers" and one for "Approval Date," as we require external customer approval frequently. We also have a custom property for the ECN/NPI reference, which is shown in our revision table.
The details of an ECN/NPI are tracked using Smartsheet forms, which monitor reference numbers, stages, and other relevant information.
One of the challenges we face with Onshape is that to have non-CAD users (such as approvers) involved in the approval process, you need to have an Enterprise account. However, since we need approval from many external customers, this setup doesn’t work for us, and we’ve had to find workarounds.
A little off topic but additionally, from my past experience, very few PLM/MES/ERP software providers cater to SMEs without requiring a large upfront commitment. Most providers I’ve contacted expect a minimum purchase of five licenses, which makes it difficult for small businesses like ours. Even Arena, which integrates well with Onshape, has this same limitation, and that’s been quite disappointing.

Re: Engineering Change Notices / New Part Introductions & OnShape
That's what we do, but using a template in MS Office 365.
There is no integration between OS and any other system at my company. We have an ERP system and had 2 companies come in to show us how to integrate OS with it. They were both outrageous money, something like 10-15k per year. Way more than OS, and I think more than the ERP system.
We are a very small startup, with only 3 CAD licenses.
Re: How do I make the camera controls not awful? Seriously, everything shouldnt tilt on camera-rotate
Re: How do I make the camera controls not awful? Seriously, everything shouldnt tilt on camera-rotate
You guys are making assumptions that key modifiers will save the world. It won't! E.g. in Linux Alt is used to manipulate window size/position so just using "alt to orbit" won't cut it. There needs to be a setting allowing that (and orbiting point) to be configurable, rather than forcing one to abandon one of the most useful features of the operating system being used. That's just short-sided.NeilCooke said:Hold option/alt
Also, how do I make the rotation point (at least) fixed or (better yet) configurable?

Re: How do I make the camera controls not awful? Seriously, everything shouldnt tilt on camera-rotate
Re: Released Configured Part Not Configurable
I have a product that can be configured many different ways, and all of the various configurations must be released (and updated when a revision is made). The trouble I have, is that before release, I can easily change the assembly configuration and the assembly updates correctly with configured parts. I'm trying to figure out the best method to keep that same functionality and easily switch between multiple released configurations.