Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Options
Anyone using a (PRO) 3D printer?
Are any of you using a 3D printer in-house?
I'm seriously looking into getting the Roland monoFab combo package:
* ARM-10 3D printer
* SRM-20 milling machine
The nice thing about the SRM-20 is that it can work with STL. So no CAM progamming. Just perfect for rapid prototyping.
both of these machines are very well built and look sleek. Especially as a duo.
Which machine(s) do you guys have?
Dries
I'm seriously looking into getting the Roland monoFab combo package:
* ARM-10 3D printer
* SRM-20 milling machine
The nice thing about the SRM-20 is that it can work with STL. So no CAM progamming. Just perfect for rapid prototyping.
both of these machines are very well built and look sleek. Especially as a duo.
Which machine(s) do you guys have?
Dries
Tagged:
0
Best Answers
-
Options
kevin_quigley
Member Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
Stratasys U Print
WRT using STL for machining, most of the cheaper desktop mills on the market have CAM software that allow this. A lot of the high end CAM systems also allow machining from STL files as well.
but hey, I'm loathe to mention CAM in case you know who appears online....you know, the Voldermot of CADCAM5 -
Optionskevin_quigley
Member Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
Few things to note...
1. Consumer and low cost printers can be notoriously unreliable for repeatable printing. Prior to installing the U print we trialled multiple consumer machines and every single one had issues with accuracy when printing mating parts. Over the 6 months of our trial period the print failure rate on prototype parts (as opposed to twirly vases) was running at over 70%. The U Print "only" has 0.254mm layers but it is reliable and prints accurately, and to be honest the finish with 0.254mm layers is very similar to a Makerbot or Ultimaker at 0.1mm (you need to see to appreciate that). The other thing is, printing FDM at sub 0.1mm layers takes a long long time!
2. If you want to fiddle with a printer then consumer ones can be dialled in to give good results on certain types of geometries. The benefit of a Pro level machine is that a lot of that fiddling is automatic (self calibrating, replaceable print beds, more automation etc). One of the guys who works here built his own RepRap printer and he bemoans the lack of "flexibility" with the U print, but then he is a geek :-)
3. The biggest reason for going for a U print or above product though, is dissolvable supports. This basically means you can print anything and forget it. Lift it off the build platform, stick it in the tank, a few hrs later, you have the cleaned part. This was our main reason for going U Print level. None of the consumer machines have this capability (or at least a capability that works reliably or well). This also means you can design for 3D Printing in the knowledge that all the support will go - only powder based systems offer similar. SLA / DLP builds in one material, so you always have to remove supports and the build orientation has a great effect on the build quality.
I resisted getting 3D printing in house for years, simply because I didn't want the hassle of fiddling with the printer, but in the end I got fed up waiting for a pro level machine at a consumer level price and jumped. There is no going back now. The next investment will likely be a SLA or DLP machine for doing high resolution small parts primarily for pre mould phases.One of the most exciting areas we are looking at right now is printing mould inserts on a Objet Eden and using those inserts in a "proper" injection moulding insert tool. We are running some trials next month on some parts which up till now would have needed a development tool. With the printed inserts we are looking at doing maybe 100 impressions per set in PP, incorporating near production standard living hinges and tear off strips - things that cannot be done with 3D printing or CNC.
There will be some interesting developments in the CNC world this year. But I can't say more :-)
5
Answers
WRT using STL for machining, most of the cheaper desktop mills on the market have CAM software that allow this. A lot of the high end CAM systems also allow machining from STL files as well.
but hey, I'm loathe to mention CAM in case you know who appears online....you know, the Voldermot of CADCAM
Well, call me stupid, but I did not know that.
Any suggestions on great desktop mills besides the Roland range?
Btw, I think I know what specimen you speak of.
Dries
LearnOnshape facebook group
1. Consumer and low cost printers can be notoriously unreliable for repeatable printing. Prior to installing the U print we trialled multiple consumer machines and every single one had issues with accuracy when printing mating parts. Over the 6 months of our trial period the print failure rate on prototype parts (as opposed to twirly vases) was running at over 70%. The U Print "only" has 0.254mm layers but it is reliable and prints accurately, and to be honest the finish with 0.254mm layers is very similar to a Makerbot or Ultimaker at 0.1mm (you need to see to appreciate that). The other thing is, printing FDM at sub 0.1mm layers takes a long long time!
2. If you want to fiddle with a printer then consumer ones can be dialled in to give good results on certain types of geometries. The benefit of a Pro level machine is that a lot of that fiddling is automatic (self calibrating, replaceable print beds, more automation etc). One of the guys who works here built his own RepRap printer and he bemoans the lack of "flexibility" with the U print, but then he is a geek :-)
3. The biggest reason for going for a U print or above product though, is dissolvable supports. This basically means you can print anything and forget it. Lift it off the build platform, stick it in the tank, a few hrs later, you have the cleaned part. This was our main reason for going U Print level. None of the consumer machines have this capability (or at least a capability that works reliably or well). This also means you can design for 3D Printing in the knowledge that all the support will go - only powder based systems offer similar. SLA / DLP builds in one material, so you always have to remove supports and the build orientation has a great effect on the build quality.
I resisted getting 3D printing in house for years, simply because I didn't want the hassle of fiddling with the printer, but in the end I got fed up waiting for a pro level machine at a consumer level price and jumped. There is no going back now. The next investment will likely be a SLA or DLP machine for doing high resolution small parts primarily for pre mould phases.One of the most exciting areas we are looking at right now is printing mould inserts on a Objet Eden and using those inserts in a "proper" injection moulding insert tool. We are running some trials next month on some parts which up till now would have needed a development tool. With the printed inserts we are looking at doing maybe 100 impressions per set in PP, incorporating near production standard living hinges and tear off strips - things that cannot be done with 3D printing or CNC.
There will be some interesting developments in the CNC world this year. But I can't say more :-)
I second Kevin's comments. We waited for a professional level machine because we didn't want to fuss with Makerbots, and etc... We like to print every piece of our product and take it through the manufacturing process ahead of time to flush out improvements ahead of tooling investments. The changes are then fed back into the product. We prototype the process, if you will.
Too good a deal to pass up!
I think the machines elevate each other...
Dries
Dries