Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Is it possible to "import" a DWG file that contains 3D data and have it usable in a Part Studio?

It imported into OS ok as flat drawing.

But the imported data appears to be useless to me in OS.
Am I missing something?
Answers
-
Is it a solid in AutoCAD ?
If you can you export it as a step file from AutoCad you should get in as 3D imported part in OS.
0 -
If the washing machine in AutoCAD is a 3D model you can export it as ACIS (*.sat) using the command ACISOUT.
Then import the file to Onshape and you should get a 3D model.
0 -
I am using DraftSight (free version).
ASICOUT (a.k.a. EXPORTSAT) expects a Region, Solid, or Body. What I have is a block composed of "mesh". I exploded the block, but "mesh" entities appear not to be valid entities for an EXPORTSAT.
Within DraftSight there is an File->Export->Sterreolithography command, which one would think could be used with mesh entities, but is also wants a Region, Solid, or Body. I could find no method within DraftSight to create a Region, Solid, or Body from the mesh data.
1 -
Hello, have you finally found a solution to import this model into onshape ? I have similar issue with a chair model provided by supplier in dwg and I can not use it in onshape. Thanks
0 -
The solution is explained above. Ask them to ACISOUT.Senior Director, Technical Services, EMEA0
-
The washing machine data file was obtained directly from the manufacturer's (General Electric) website. The .dwg format was the only 3D format made available. Asking GE to join the 21'st century and provide a modern 3D format is really not an option.
It is unrealistic to expect OS to go out if its way to support importing of CAD data from companies that still operate in the dark ages.0 -
I usually import into solidworks from the 3D file, or open it with mechanical desktop and "stepout"
It would be nice if Onshape could import a 3D dwg. Probably won't see that until 3D sketches arrive though.
I would be happy with a wireframe imported from dwg at the minimum to start.
But if you're still having trouble getting the 3D, let me know I could try and convert it for you0 -
Here is the link to the manufacture's 3D .dwg file:
https://products.geappliances.com/MarketingObjectRetrieval/Dispatcher?RequestType=Binary&RecId=11557
Dassault no longer offers a free version of DraftSight (it's now $99/yr) so I have lost my ability to manipulate AutoDesk dwg files that contain 3D data. Do you happen to know of a "free" software product that I can use to refactor 3D dwg files into something that can then be imported into Onshape. I want to have a 3D volume of the geometry to be used for reference to build designs of other things.
Good luck.0 -
Nanocad is pretty good0
-
NanoCAD, pretty good for what? I find it increasing more difficult to suppress the gag reflex whenever I have to use a AutoCAD style drawing tool.
I could not find a function within the free version of NanoCAD (V5) that would export the 3D data in a form that could be read by OS.0 -
@StephenG
Try the free version of form•Z
I’ve owned form•Z since early 90s and it’s always been pretty good at import and export of DXF and DWGCan’t say as I’ve ever played with the free version. But I believe it will handle the import and export0 -
@StephenG
I imported the DWG into forms•Z, then exported as SAT
On the second document, before exporting out of form•Z, I reduced the mesh
If you look where the parts and surfaces are listed in onshape, you’ll see a number of items in orange. Maybe this is because the mesh DWG had some irregularities, and form•Z was doing the best it could when importing it
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d01ae369d41bd24ca978e53d/w/7888fd1c6c2567f937c88836/e/d81c0f95527191ed5251665c
1 -
@StephenG
When importing the DWG into form•Z, make sure you have the dialog box set like it shows down in the red rectangle
0 -
0
-
@StephenG
I believe they are public.
I’m using the free version. Aren’t all documents created with the free version, automatically public ?You need to sign in to the forum, or you need to sign in to cad.onshape.com
Then when you click on the link, you’ll be able to open up the documents
OR
Go to the public area and search by name
0 -
Sorry. I made the mistake of attempting to open the document on my Android phone and got a "You do not have permission to access this document" message. I assumed it was because the documents were private. It turns out that I needed to prelaunch the Onshape app first.
Really impressed you actually got something, but the import is rather messy.
formZ looks to be a interesting product for architectural type design work. I will certainly look into as a tool to manipulate dwg files containing 3D data and to convert data into a format that OS will import.
Thanks for telling me about formZ.
0 -
@StephenG
I thought for sure I read years ago that the free version of form•Z would allow import and export of DXF and DWG.
I know the PRO version handles SAT. So I was thinking that this Free version would handle SAT also
But I thought, maybe I should go look at their site and see if I can get a definitive answer on this because it’s been a while since I’ve delved into the program about things like this
I went and looked and found a comparison chart between their three versions. PRO, Junior, and Free
And at the bottom of the long comparison chart, well it looks like the Free version does not handle DXF and DWG and also it doesn’t handle SAT.
You’d have to have one of the pay versions to deal with those file types.
Maybe the free version did handle these different formats at one time but from what the comparison chart says, it looks like that’s not the case now
Sorry about that
0




