Can we use FS to set the "Exclude from BOM" property.

owen_sparks · May 2018

Hi folks.

I have a part studio that uses configurations to create a laminated material.

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5022071/uploads/editor/73/oxi92p6cazbi.png

I have the configuration table set a sensible PN and name description for just the first layer of the laminate but I'd like to exclude all the other layers from the BOM. Rather than set many values in a table for each config option I thought I'd use FS to set the exclude from BOM property.

setProperty(context, {<br>                    "entities" : definition.bodies,<br>                    "propertyType" : PropertyType.Exclude from BOM,

The auto complete doesn't seem to show such a setting, so my Q is "is this property exposed to FS?".

Thanks for your time,

Owen S.

NeilCooke · May 2018

Hi @owen_sparks - in short, no, though I don't see why not?

Here is the enum:

export enum PropertyType
{
    NAME,
    MATERIAL,
    APPEARANCE,
    DESCRIPTION,
    PART_NUMBER,
    VENDOR,
    PROJECT,
    PRODUCT_LINE,
    TITLE_1,
    TITLE_2,
    TITLE_3,
    CUSTOM
}

ilya_baran · May 2018

That's fine, I think it's simple enough that I'll just add it (not next release, but "coming soon").

ilya_baran · June 2018

This should be available as of the update we pushed yesterday (make sure you use the latest version of std).

owen_sparks · June 2018

@ilya_baran

Thanks again, 60 seconds of featurescript and I now have BOMs in "sensible mode".

Image: https://us.v-cdn.net/5022071/uploads/editor/jk/i4iulhoy78d2.png

Happy Onshaper here.

Cheers,

Owen S.

NeilCooke · May 2018

Hi @owen_sparks - in short, no, though I don't see why not?

Here is the enum:

export enum PropertyType
{
    NAME,
    MATERIAL,
    APPEARANCE,
    DESCRIPTION,
    PART_NUMBER,
    VENDOR,
    PROJECT,
    PRODUCT_LINE,
    TITLE_1,
    TITLE_2,
    TITLE_3,
    CUSTOM
}

owen_sparks · May 2018

Thanks Neil.

Is there anyone's desk that I can bribe you to loom over to make it happen?

(As a future release, please don't go to any trouble today.)

Cheers,

Owen S.

Jake_Rosenfeld · May 2018

@owen_sparks

I think the best looming may actually be creating an IR for this.

owen_sparks · May 2018

Thanks Jake, that I can do.
Cheers, Owen S.

ilya_baran · May 2018

That's fine, I think it's simple enough that I'll just add it (not next release, but "coming soon").

owen_sparks · May 2018

ilya_baran said:

That's fine, I think it's simple enough that I'll just add it (not next release, but "coming soon").

Excellent, thanks for that, much obliged.

Have a good weekend, Cheers Owen S.

ilya_baran · June 2018

This should be available as of the update we pushed yesterday (make sure you use the latest version of std).

owen_sparks · June 2018

Outstanding, thank you @ilya_baran, I'll make good use of it on Monday.

Cheers,
Owen S.

owen_sparks · June 2018

@ilya_baran

Thanks again, 60 seconds of featurescript and I now have BOMs in "sensible mode".

Happy Onshaper here.

Cheers,

Owen S.

Can we use FS to set the "Exclude from BOM" property.

Best Answers

Answers

Categories