Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Improvements to Onshape - March 1st, 2019
Comments
-
It could actually just be stored as XYZ offset and two rotationskonstantin_shiriazdanov said:H_de_V said:agree, todays ability to define only one rotation for MC is pretty limiting, I think we should be able to perform the sequence of MC orientation changes of any length, not just 3 axis linear offset and 1 axis rotation. [...]
Do you mean resulting in a MC at an undefined location? I this wise? One wants to have specific distances and angles to keep design intent, isn't it?I mean that with triad manipulator we could perform any sequence of MC orientation changes - not just 3 linear and then 1 rotational as it is now, for example you could rotate it around triad X, then rotate around triad Y and then move along triad Z - which is not possible today. Also would be nice to log this transform sequence in the MC feature inteface as list input so that we could edit it at any stage.0 -
@brucebartlettWe are showing the features that directly contribute geometry to the part. That is the same information we use to cross-highlight selected geometry and features in the feature tree. Sketches are not so directly linked, but we could find them as well ( notice the tooltips on features listing referenced sketches) .
Is there any reason that the part filter doesn't show related sketches?
It is great that these filters are easier discoverable now. I have a feeling, we'll be getting more IRs about them. 2 -
Thanks Lana! I'd found the RMB on the feature brings up the sketch from the filtered feature as per normal but the tool tip is also a nice way to see the related sketch.lana said:0 -
Great improvements!!!
A lot of them we can use in our own FeatureScripts
ThanksUn saludo,
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común2 -
Improvements are awesome1
-
Thanks!
1. CLOUD LINE FOR REVISION
2. WEIGHT PORPERTY IN BOM
neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed it badly.3 -
I notice there are a new version (V4) in std.mat document
But I don't know if there are new materials or just minor changesUn saludo,
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común0 -
En este enlace podéis ver las Novedades de Onshape en español
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8lhkeX_5Z8
Un saludo,
Eduardo Magdalena C2i Change 2 improve ☑ ¿Por qué no organizamos una reunión online?
Partner de PTC - Onshape Averigua a quién conocemos en común3 -
@MBartlett21MBartlett21 said:
It could actually just be stored as XYZ offset and two rotationskonstantin_shiriazdanov said:I mean that with triad manipulator we could perform any sequence of MC orientation changes - not just 3 linear and then 1 rotational as it is now, for example you could rotate it around triad X, then rotate around triad Y and then move along triad Z - which is not possible today. Also would be nice to log this transform sequence in the MC feature inteface as list input so that we could edit it at any stage.
Eventually you are right, but when user defines a sequence of MC orientation transforms in local coordinate system he would expect ability to edit orientation in local coord system either, but equal tramsform of XYZ and 2 rotations would be defined in global coordinate system, and though it would be algebraically correct it wouldn't represent initial design intent as Henk said.0 -
Thanks for the update. Also for self-clinchers which we plan to use shortly...!Hendrik1
-
Fantastic!Thank you Onshape team.1
-
Implicit Mate Connectors are great! Super, thank you Onshape team.2
-
-
How do you remove a broken out section view that is no longer needed?
0 -
0
-
@PeteYodis that worked perfectly, I was right-clicking on the view not the area of the broken-out section.
0 -
@Steve_Leposa Yes, we require right clicking on the section area - because there could be multiple broken out sections on a view.0
-
Well howdy, and thanks for saying hello and for the work you're doingRoy_Mutalik said:
Is there any danger of you doing any of that in the not too distant futureRoy_Mutalik said:
I'm looking forward to "meeting", helping, and sharing more great Onshape content with each of you here on the forums and beyond.
Cheers, Owen S.Business Systems and Configuration Controller
HWM-Water Ltd0 -
Ilya Baran \ VP, Architecture and FeatureScript \ Onshape Inc3
-
I was a tad worried when you said that. Thought perhaps you'd all accidentally spent the last three weeks playing Fortnite 🎮 instead of working! Glad to see you've actually been building yet more new Onshape update goodness instead. Thanks all 🔧🔨🚧ilya_baran said:
Owen.Business Systems and Configuration Controller
HWM-Water Ltd0 -
@owen_sparks
I'll be very impressed if someone invents a video game that's as fun as building CAD systems.Ilya Baran \ VP, Architecture and FeatureScript \ Onshape Inc5 -
Hah..... Love your dedication, you're a true CAD Warrior keep all us lowly jockeys happy.ilya_baran said:@owen_sparks
I'll be very impressed if someone invents a video game that's as fun as building CAD systems.2 -
I'm having trouble getting my ordinates to un-jog -- they aren't snapping to a straight position like is shown in the video. I can drag and get them approximately straight, but I can still tell they're not quite right and it's pretty time-consuming. Any suggestions?0














