Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: Add a section view to a drawing with a break view
We are working to enable breaking a section view. Keep an eye out soon. This will not be delivered with an alignment behavior as mentioned. View alignment needs to be improved to be able to support alignment by their centers and then we can support proper cases for break views. Beyond that there will be a need to deliver on parent/child break view scenarios where a break is effective across parent and child views and the break lines between them are associative. All known things that we intend to deliver on.
PeteYodis
13
Re: How to make BOM's awesome?
I occasionally use BoMs on large projects producing drawing packages which fill a briefcase, involving hundreds of subassemblies and of course many more parts ... and the following list is perhaps tipped a little in that direction. Like most contract designers, I'm never doing the same sort of work long enough to develop easy expertise -- in this case with megaBoMs -- so cryptic and arcane user interfaces are disproportionately detrimental.
However if future capabilities are part of the early planning, they should be able to be integrated much more seamlessly and with a simpler UX when the time comes. In no particular order:
1) Ability to click on a BoM line entry, and go direct to the part or subassembly
2) Ability to edit part and subassy properties from the BoM
3) Ability to override number of instances of a subassy or part, eg where a higher level assy shows only selected instances. Override to be permanently flagged to the CAD operator
4) Sophisticated control over whether and how subassemblies 'dissolve' in the BoM to reveal nested subassies and parts. Hopefully as powerful as SW, but ideally less confusing for the uninitiated.
5) An easily accessed part property which sets an "Exclude from BoM" flag.
It would be great if there was also an ability to click on a BoM and see a list (even if only temporarily - we can grab a screenshot if need be) of excluded parts. The same, or a similar facility, could also list overrides in operation. (ref point 3)
6) Flexibility as to whether filenames constitute Part Nos for the purposes of the BoM
7) Ability to split balloon numbering sequences easily over a number of drawing sheets
8) Flexibility of balloon and box shapes (PLEASE either allow us to draw a master box ourselves, OR include options such as Obrounds, eg like a keyway or slot profile, and PLEASE don't shrink boxes tightly, unless we can override the amount of white space ... and ideally, perhaps allow for several 'compartments' per box, with vertical dividers, for segregated-designator item numbers)
However if future capabilities are part of the early planning, they should be able to be integrated much more seamlessly and with a simpler UX when the time comes. In no particular order:
1) Ability to click on a BoM line entry, and go direct to the part or subassembly
2) Ability to edit part and subassy properties from the BoM
3) Ability to override number of instances of a subassy or part, eg where a higher level assy shows only selected instances. Override to be permanently flagged to the CAD operator
4) Sophisticated control over whether and how subassemblies 'dissolve' in the BoM to reveal nested subassies and parts. Hopefully as powerful as SW, but ideally less confusing for the uninitiated.
5) An easily accessed part property which sets an "Exclude from BoM" flag.
It would be great if there was also an ability to click on a BoM and see a list (even if only temporarily - we can grab a screenshot if need be) of excluded parts. The same, or a similar facility, could also list overrides in operation. (ref point 3)
6) Flexibility as to whether filenames constitute Part Nos for the purposes of the BoM
7) Ability to split balloon numbering sequences easily over a number of drawing sheets
8) Flexibility of balloon and box shapes (PLEASE either allow us to draw a master box ourselves, OR include options such as Obrounds, eg like a keyway or slot profile, and PLEASE don't shrink boxes tightly, unless we can override the amount of white space ... and ideally, perhaps allow for several 'compartments' per box, with vertical dividers, for segregated-designator item numbers)
Re: The voting system is non anonymous and biased
I doubt the moderator removed the down vote, I assume the person who voted felt guilty after realizing it was taken personally.
I too don't care for the down vote system.. it is black stain on your profile that most of the time is undeserving. I've been down voted many times because I answered the question with something like "No, Onshape does not support that function yet, Please submit an improvement request".. as if it is MY fault Onshape doesn't have a feature lol... Ah well...
Better etiquette in my humble opinion is to follow up a down vote with a short message as to why. "I down voted you because you were rude"
I gladly accept those down votes and don't question them if I can read my post again and can see for myself why I get down voted even without a follow up. I will edit and apologize if I am wrong or offend someone.
I don't care who says up/down.. just want to be known as the good/helpful guy on the profile page. Not the.. oh this guy is a complete a-hole he has 8 down votes... Even though if you read through them that generally isn't the case.
Don't get me wrong, I was an a-hole on a few posts and truly deserve some of the down votes. But to everyone out there: Your votes are your own opinion. Vote however you feel justified. Just know the general feeling of a down vote here is like saying "This was totally off topic, or disrespectful"
I too don't care for the down vote system.. it is black stain on your profile that most of the time is undeserving. I've been down voted many times because I answered the question with something like "No, Onshape does not support that function yet, Please submit an improvement request".. as if it is MY fault Onshape doesn't have a feature lol... Ah well...
Better etiquette in my humble opinion is to follow up a down vote with a short message as to why. "I down voted you because you were rude"
I gladly accept those down votes and don't question them if I can read my post again and can see for myself why I get down voted even without a follow up. I will edit and apologize if I am wrong or offend someone.
I don't care who says up/down.. just want to be known as the good/helpful guy on the profile page. Not the.. oh this guy is a complete a-hole he has 8 down votes... Even though if you read through them that generally isn't the case.
Don't get me wrong, I was an a-hole on a few posts and truly deserve some of the down votes. But to everyone out there: Your votes are your own opinion. Vote however you feel justified. Just know the general feeling of a down vote here is like saying "This was totally off topic, or disrespectful"
Is it possible to change the drill points on a hole to a flat bottom hole instead of pointed?
I want to have a tapped hole but it be flat bottomed. I don't see that option.
How to specify a linetype for a part or assembly when it is shown in a drawing view ?
Hi 
Out client wants to see close by geometry in GA drawings for some of the equipment we design.
This exsting near geometry should be shown with dashed / hidden linetype in the drawing. The purpose is to make it easy to understand where this part/assy is loctated.
I know this can by done in Solidworks, but is there a way to do it in Onshape ??
Thank you
Out client wants to see close by geometry in GA drawings for some of the equipment we design.
This exsting near geometry should be shown with dashed / hidden linetype in the drawing. The purpose is to make it easy to understand where this part/assy is loctated.
I know this can by done in Solidworks, but is there a way to do it in Onshape ??
Thank you
Re: Why are fastened offsets sign (+/-) a crap shoot?
@tim_hess427 I think you're right.
Another way to see is that when you change the mate's z-offset to a positive number, it's the first part you selected that moves in Z+ direction relative to it's own Mate Connector .... This can be confusing becuase we conceptually think about the two parts we are mating as moving toward / away from each other. However, I think the movement is ONLY related to the first selected part's Mate Connector axis direction. It's almost as if the offset is really only affecting the first part relative to itself.
Another way to see is that when you change the mate's z-offset to a positive number, it's the first part you selected that moves in Z+ direction relative to it's own Mate Connector .... This can be confusing becuase we conceptually think about the two parts we are mating as moving toward / away from each other. However, I think the movement is ONLY related to the first selected part's Mate Connector axis direction. It's almost as if the offset is really only affecting the first part relative to itself.
Onshape Live 21 - Our First Ever User Conference!
Onshape is excited to host our first virtual user conference on Thursday, March 11, 2021, from 2:00 - 6:00 PM EST.

REGISTER HERE (it's free!)
You'll get an insider's look at what's ahead for Onshape in our Sneak Peek. Also, loads of new Tips n' Tricks,
a "look under the hood" at Onshape's cloud architecture, and FEA, Rendering, CAM, ECAD, and more from our partners!
Come hear the keynote address by PTC CEO Jim Heppelmann and a "State of the Union" presentation by Jon Hirschtick.
There will be 10 presentations in all, giveaways, and an open Networking Hour.
Seriously, we're going to share things you won't hear anywhere else...register today and join the fun!

REGISTER HERE (it's free!)
You'll get an insider's look at what's ahead for Onshape in our Sneak Peek. Also, loads of new Tips n' Tricks,
a "look under the hood" at Onshape's cloud architecture, and FEA, Rendering, CAM, ECAD, and more from our partners!
Come hear the keynote address by PTC CEO Jim Heppelmann and a "State of the Union" presentation by Jon Hirschtick.
There will be 10 presentations in all, giveaways, and an open Networking Hour.
Seriously, we're going to share things you won't hear anywhere else...register today and join the fun!






