Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: If I change the extrusion thickness of my part the slot feature I have attached to it mysteriously m
There is no right click constrain. Constrains including dimensions are across the top tool bar. When all turns black the sketch is fully constrained. You may want to take some of the learning center courses regarding sketching. Well worth the time.
Keyboard entry on the Variable Table/Studio, Variable Dialog
Two variable entry issues:
***
Variable Table/Studio:
Often I will have several simple variables I need to enter at once. Not some massive number, but something like 3 -10. Not enough that I would want to import a spreadsheet full of them.
The fastest way is the variable table - generally (int a document or the Variable Studio). But there a hitch - it doesn't make it easy to enter the values.
As a comparison, if I was entering the variables on a Excel or Google Sheets, I would click on the first cell, type the name, and then I could press tab and I would be in the next column. I could also press enter and go to the next row. In the variable table, if I press enter tab I always move to the next row. If I want to enter the value, I have to press enter/tab, and then shift-tab twice will get me back to the field, or use the mouse.
It's a hitch in keyboard use. It's absolutely not a lot, but it matters, especially since it is very different from a normal spreadsheet.
You should have TAB move the cursor to the value field (or even the type field). ENTER will go to the next row when the user only wants to enter a name and no details. This is like Excel or Google Sheets.
***
Create Variable Dialog with Dimensions
It seems like a minor thing, but it causes errors is my document (human errors).
Here's the scenario I'm entering a value on a dimension I can create a variable.
I start typing #MyNewVariable
. The New Variable…
suggestion item appears, I click enter once.
I'm in the Create Variable Dialog with the cursor on dimension text entry field. The value is the value in the field before I started entering the variable.
I may or may not change the value, and then I press enter.
Now the field shows the variable name. Here's where I make my mistake
If I click something else (or press esc) the variable has been created and exists on the table but has not been committed.
I must press enter a third time for the Variable to be attached to the Dimension.
If I don't commit the value, especially if I didn't change the value when creating the variable, the difference is visually very subtle. A dimension will have be missing the function symbol, but little else. A sketch would still be fully defined, but not the way I expect. I find myself changing variables and wondering why despite everything being defined it doesn't react as I expect.
There's very little reason to require the extra enter. A user is unlikely to want to create a variable on a dimension without cancelling it and then not assign it. Why require the extra "enter".
When the user pressed enter on the Create Variable Dialog on a Dimension, don't require the extra entry. Commit it immediately to prevent errors (and save a keystroke).
***
The keyboard entry generally seems easier now than in used to be, but these items would help a little more.
Re: Working with 3D scans
I might be one of the Youtubers who skipped details you needed, but have you seen this one?
Re: Creating a cylinder using API
@hari_haran541 : Can you share your code & the exact error message (line number etc..) you are getting. This will help in debugging the issue.
Re: How Do I Break Dependencies From a Derived Part So I Can Get Rid Of It?
@EvanReese Thank you, I did go back from a fresh document and use offset planes and got it all working. I was also running into a problem where hiding the derived part also hid the rest of its dependent parts. I'm glad I learned this lesson early at least. As for the link I think I forgot I had linked it and moved it to trash without meaning to. But thank you again, same to @S1mon
Re: Filling gaps
@ricardo_raimondo It looks like you're just a tiny step away from getting into surface modeling, which is how I'd approach this area (and the whole part really). I split out and deleted faces I didn't need, and rebuilt it using surfacing techniques. The Boundary Surface feature can't hit the continuity I want because the input surfaces around them aren't smooth enough (meaning upstream surfacing can be improved too), but this is the right idea. I recently did a surfacing deep dive on Youtube, but it's fairly advanced, so also check out the courses on the learning center too if you want to learn these kinds of workflows.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/c4577879673bc257e3e763d0/w/f87b2328dca5cb3828789776/e/6defacfbe30ad48cfacefef4
Re: How can this not be defined?
Hey Michael. If you click and hold on a line of your rectangle and move your mouse around, you can move the rectangle around. This is why it is not fully defined. The rectangle has to be fixed someplace; it has to have a 'fixed' location. Since, as it is, there is nothing else in your sketch, the only point to reference the rectangle to is the origin but that's fine.
Select any corner point and the origin and select the Coincident constraint or create dimensions from the rectangle to the origin. Everything in a sketch has to be 'fixed' either by constraints or dimensions. This doesn't mean you must always constrain a sketch entity to the origin. You can constrain a sketch entity to a previously created entity (a circle for example) but the place of reference on that that previously entity must be fully constrained for that to work.
- Scotty
Re: Is there a way to customize part names within an exported zip file?
3 years later part export rule is ignored in part studio/assembly export:
The result:
