Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: Render Battle #6 - Coffee time ☕(Winner gets a real Prize!)
@RenderBattle:
The hoodie prize was a success!
Will have to keep this in mind for future battles!
If anyone needs a quality full print shirt place: printful.com
Looking good @sebastian_glanzner!
Connection problems at south america(Brazil)
I'm from Brazil, and the closest server from me is us-west-2 at Oregon that means it is over 10.700Km as I live in the south of Brazil.
"Japan is 10,700 km from my house(USA). If I had a direct fiber from me to Japan, the time for a photon to go from one point to the other is 52.47ms. Add the return trip, and your over 100ms already. It's also one of the reasons GEO sats have pings of 600ms+" -ulmatms at a reddit post
If I open my "cmd" and type "ping onshape.com" it gives me:
As I show above, It's a REALLY HIGH PING, you could be thinking, but does it matter when you are working? If your file isn't too big, like a square, No it doesn't matter that much, but if your file it's a FRC robot (like mine) YES it does really matter! Sometimes It takes 30+ secs to add a DOT in a sketch…
I'm not making this topic to say Onshape is the worse, NO, I do really like Onshape, it's really easy to learn how to use, and is not expensive at all, but it would be really helpful to have a server at south America, and I know that I'm not the only one, of course US has way more people using Onshape than Brazil or maybe south America, but is not 0, and maybe there is not that many, because people tell other "don't even try it, you have to wait 3 business days, to open a skecth"
Ps: I saw a topic about local servers, I think it would work! like I'm in a robotics team, we could make a server and use it but…
Above you can see my besties! 👆
Re: Render Battle #6 - Coffee time ☕(Winner gets a real Prize!)
Hi @MichaelPascoe , I've added you to the beta testers group so you should now be able to subscribe to and run OnDisplay, I think this is the link to find it:
https://cad.onshape.com/appstore/apps/Rendering/67dbb5dd8e990c752fa4fb54
I'd be grateful for any feedback, and I hope you'll enjoy it :-) !
All the best,
Stephanos
Re: Squaring Variable expression or how to square a number in onshape
@jelte_steur814 is correct — sqrt(#upper_x^2 + #upper_y^2) should work with units. Even better is hypot(#upper_x, #upper_y).
Re: How can I display a grid when I am drawing an sketch?
I'm not familiar with food4rhino, but it looks pretty similar.
fs.place is a marketplace for FeatureScripts.
If you have any questions, feel free to shoot me an email.
Re: How can I display a grid when I am drawing an sketch?
No grid feature still? Other alternatives to it?
Re: How can I display a grid when I am drawing an sketch?
ar·bi·trar·y, adjective, based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system
A grid is hardly arbitrary as it is based on whichever units of measurement you have learned to love.
Wouldn't the easiest way to make, say, a 4.25"x6.5" rectangle, be clicking and dragging until it reads 4.25"x6.5"?? Ya know, rather than making essentially an unknown size rectangle and then adjusting it using multiple clicks and keystrokes?
I feel like UI improvements should make things more intuitive.
I know Shapr3d isn't really a parametric program (or even a serious contender) but they did the grid thing right. It consists of very light gray lines, on the plane you are currently working on. The grid is 1mm squares and as you zoom in or out it adjusts to .5mm, or 2mm, or 5mm, etc. so there is no "adjusting the grid". The grid can be locked to the current increment if you desire. Snap to grid can easily be turned on and off. After using the grid to sketch or align an object.
Or a player can adjust dimensions by simply clicking on a line and typing in the dimension that one desires.
Shapr3d as a whole is a joke but their UI is king. I'm hoping they can continue to improve to the point where they can compete with more serious programs. Then I won't have to go on these forums or any other forum to try to figure out how to do a thing.
Re: How can I display a grid when I am drawing an sketch?
I am generally curious here. Can someone point me to a youtube or a real world use case explaining in detail the need for grids? Maybe I'm missing something that would make me more efficient.
MDesign
Re: I am so done with this...
Quite frankly, you could have just said, "I prefer Fusion over Onshape, it just doesn’t work for me. How do I reach out to provide my feedback?"
I was trying to get a sense of where you're coming from, whether you're a student or a teacher. It sounds like you’ve spent a good amount of time with Fusion and built up your workflow there, possibly learning through YouTube and other online resources. That might also explain why cost is such a concern. If you're using this in an educational context, it could be worth seeing if your school can access Onshape’s education plan, which might benefit more than just you.
I did want to respond to a few points. For example, the idea that Onshape only works for large assemblies isn’t quite accurate. Onshape’s part studio and assembly system scales well and works just as effectively with small assemblies. Its structure is designed for consistency, whether you're building two parts or two thousand.
Onshape is still evolving and gaining features, but like others have said, taking the time to explore it more thoroughly can help unlock its full potential.
In a professional setting, you don’t always get to choose your software. You’re often expected to adapt to whatever tools the company uses. From experience hiring students, you can usually tell the difference in modelling habits between those trained in Fusion and those trained in more traditional CAD tools like SolidWorks, Inventor, or Onshape. Fusion users sometimes bring in modelling practices influenced by more casual or informal learning resources, where only they will work on the files, while the other platforms like Onshape, Solidworks or Inventor tend to have more structured training materials.
I use both Fusion and Onshape regularly. The only major edge I’d give Fusion is its integrated CAM. But it’s not without issues, needing to manually enable “capture design history,” the complexity of configuration tools, and frustrations around drawing creation. The worst for me was when an update wiped out a chunk of my data, which took a long time to recover.
Would you be open to sharing a few of the models where you ran into trouble? Seeing how they were built might help forum members offer some useful alternatives or techniques. Based on what you’ve said, the issues may have more to do with the approach than platform limitations.
Nath_McC
Re: Looking for Beta Testers – Try Out OnDisplay!
@EvanReese , @Ste_Wilson , or anybody else, if you'd like to send me an email at info@ondisplay.design I'd love to grant you "back stage access" to OnDisplay so you can try it out and give me any feedback, I'd really appreciate that!
Thanks!
Stephanos










