Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Loft connecting same vertex twice
brett_sutton
Member Posts: 42 ✭✭✭
I've created three lofts in my document which are almost identical in that each of the 'end sketches' for the lofts are the same shape except the are of slightly different sizes.
Two of the lofts work perfectly. The third however has gone a little wierd.
One of the vertices at one end of the loft appear to connect to two vertices at the other end.
Each end sketch has the same no. of verticies.
The only difference I can see is that the problem loft is adjacent to another extusion whereas the two lofts that are functioning are have no (parallel) adjacent extrusions.
You can seem my document here.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/fae3550df7c64658a6c35c9c/w/888bd5116d12448a95970bdd/e/827090b68f3a4a3f97eb5f70
The loft is labeled 'the loft that is wrong'
with sketch 2 and sketch 3 been the two ends of the loft.
So is this a bug in onshape or a bug in my understanding?
Brett
Two of the lofts work perfectly. The third however has gone a little wierd.
One of the vertices at one end of the loft appear to connect to two vertices at the other end.
Each end sketch has the same no. of verticies.
The only difference I can see is that the problem loft is adjacent to another extusion whereas the two lofts that are functioning are have no (parallel) adjacent extrusions.
You can seem my document here.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/fae3550df7c64658a6c35c9c/w/888bd5116d12448a95970bdd/e/827090b68f3a4a3f97eb5f70
The loft is labeled 'the loft that is wrong'
with sketch 2 and sketch 3 been the two ends of the loft.
So is this a bug in onshape or a bug in my understanding?
Brett
0
Best Answer
-
r_paul Member Posts: 22 ✭✭brett_sutton
Brett, I redrew your the offending form in sketch 3 and it worked fine. At least it matches the lofted shape of the others so I am assuming its ok.
Suspect you may have had a duplicate/additional point or extra geometry which was being taken into account.
Have another go at redrawing yourself and see what result you get, I think you will be fine.5
Answers
Well, I can't find a problem with your method (without a major dissection, at any rate)
I think it's time to share the model with Support (under "Share" at top right), click on "Feedback" from the open model (under the ?), and submit a ticket.
Brett, I redrew your the offending form in sketch 3 and it worked fine. At least it matches the lofted shape of the others so I am assuming its ok.
Suspect you may have had a duplicate/additional point or extra geometry which was being taken into account.
Have another go at redrawing yourself and see what result you get, I think you will be fine.
So as you said it looks like I had drawn over the sketch a second time (or at least had some duplicated vertices).
So solved it eventually, but it does seem like a short coming of onshape that its not easy to see if you have doubled up with lines or points within a sketch.
I eventually use the 'select other' which gave me some hint as to what was going on.
Not quite certain as to what to suggest, almost need a '3d expand' view for the sketch which shows you a 'layered' view of your sketch so you can see any duplicated lines or vertices.
But much thanks for your help.
My first diagnostic step, having made an extra copy of the part studio for the purpose, was to select the five lines of each profile, making sure to use only five clicks, and delete them.
The aim was to check that there were only five entities, and it seemed that there were.
This (it seemed to me) was confirmed when, having deleted them, no entity was revealed to have been overlaid by them.
So, particularly in the context of a beta product, it seems to me that submitting the original model to support would still be worthwhile, in the spirit of the "common good"
Perhaps Onshape need to consider something ... "along these lines".