Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Is there any way to prevent laser joint sockets from penetrating both walls of a tube?
DGF65
Member Posts: 3 PRO
I have successfully created pins and sockets on tube joints, however i cant find a way to prevent the sockets from extending right through the far wall of the second tube.
See example https://cad.onshape.com/documents/7b1fcf924bc3bd3b89b96777/w/702e3f28adb5dedf3c2d04c3/e/bc9a81099715333be1df8ed5
am i overlooking something?
See example https://cad.onshape.com/documents/7b1fcf924bc3bd3b89b96777/w/702e3f28adb5dedf3c2d04c3/e/bc9a81099715333be1df8ed5
am i overlooking something?
Tagged:
0
Best Answers
-
EvanReese Member, Mentor Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭✭✭I took a look and all I can say is 🤷♂️. I thought maybe in the script there was an endBound that was easy to identify as the culprit, but I think there's more going on there and the person most suited to solve it is @lemon1324
If it's uncommon enough to not warrant a feature update, you could just delete the extra holes with Delete Face. I'd right-click -> create selection -> tangent connected -> pick the holes.Evan Reese5 -
fnxf Member, User Group Leader Posts: 138 PROYou could also split the second tube before making the laser joint, and then uniting after the laser joint feature. No need to pick holes.8
-
lemon1324 Member, Developers Posts: 225 EDUHuh, I'll definitely take a look when I get time, I was pretty sure I wasn't doing any through-all extrudes as part of the feature.
I think it may be that as part of a speed optimization I rewrote the algorithm which cuts the features in the tab part and didn't fully mirror that algorithm to the base part. At any rate, I've got a test case in my document now, so keep an eye out for an update soon(ish).
In the meantime, the split/union approach is probably the most parametric workaround, albeit annoying if you have to do it many times.
(strictly speaking, trying to run it on a non-planar part violates the assumptions stated in the feature documentation, but I'll see if I can add this as a supported use anyway)Arul Suresh
PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University5
Answers
If it's uncommon enough to not warrant a feature update, you could just delete the extra holes with Delete Face. I'd right-click -> create selection -> tangent connected -> pick the holes.
I think it may be that as part of a speed optimization I rewrote the algorithm which cuts the features in the tab part and didn't fully mirror that algorithm to the base part. At any rate, I've got a test case in my document now, so keep an eye out for an update soon(ish).
In the meantime, the split/union approach is probably the most parametric workaround, albeit annoying if you have to do it many times.
(strictly speaking, trying to run it on a non-planar part violates the assumptions stated in the feature documentation, but I'll see if I can add this as a supported use anyway)
PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University
I see it being really helpful for design of tube laser cut projects.It is already brilliant for sheet cut asse
thanks also Evan and fnxf for your workarounds.