Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Merging several surfaces into a part gives different error
oleg_goriunov
Member Posts: 9 ✭
Hi
I am trying to merge 4 surfaces together using Boolean Union function.
The problem is that I can successfully merge three out of 4 items, but not the fourth one.
The Boolean function indeed highlights the lines with red which are supposed to be problematic. But I really can't understand what is the problem.
Here is the link to the doc https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d6ef1898cbe78bfe502377d6/w/5c9396ba4ab74ae4bae0801d/e/d6b06a2dfd90111f809ce86f
I am trying to merge 4 surfaces together using Boolean Union function.
The problem is that I can successfully merge three out of 4 items, but not the fourth one.
The Boolean function indeed highlights the lines with red which are supposed to be problematic. But I really can't understand what is the problem.
Here is the link to the doc https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d6ef1898cbe78bfe502377d6/w/5c9396ba4ab74ae4bae0801d/e/d6b06a2dfd90111f809ce86f
0
Best Answers
-
Prachi Member, OS Professional Posts: 262 ✭✭✭It has been a while since I looked at Simscale but was pretty sure surfaces were not a requirement. Went back to Simscale and found that a solid model could be imported directly from OS. In the sample here, part 1 in studio 5 imported directly. Have not run the simulation but model details are in place.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/07964c1f8f82cd21f49f477d/w/7d164a9d1caeb961fb2ec834/e/b536af277e55d8944818443e
1 -
lana Onshape Employees Posts: 711Surface restrictor can not be merged with Horizontal Pipe because such merge would create non-manifold geometry.0
Answers
Thank you for having a look at the doc!
The whole thing is a ventilation pipe with a box attached to it. The restrictor is supposed to re-direct part of the airflow (coming from bottom-up) into the box.
I am creating this model to import it into a physical processes simulator (called simscale). Simscale requires all the components to be one single part.
The restrictor that is inside the main part is created by extrusion from a line limited by the side surfaces of the box and then split by the horizontal pipe.
(Alternative variant that I used to make was to create this restrictor by extruding a line limited by the part (three united surfaces: box+horzontal pie + vertical pipe).
Keeping in mind that I created the restrictor by extrusion limited by the shape of the surrounded objects, I expect it to coincide in size with the volume of the surrounding objects (box + pipes).
My final aim to to make the whole thing being a single part. (preferable keeping it all surfaces, not transforming (thickening) into a solid. But if surfaces approach won't work, I'd have to go solid).
P.S. For some very strange reason I am unable to post a new comment for a few hours already (like it is under review)
You might find it easier to build everything except for "Surface restrictor" as a solid and either hollow it or offset surface with 0 offset, if you want the final model to be a surface.
In your model the Boolean operation should succeed if Surface restrictor is not selected in it. It can not be merged with Horizontal Pipe.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/07964c1f8f82cd21f49f477d/w/7d164a9d1caeb961fb2ec834/e/b536af277e55d8944818443e
I can't figure out how to make all the 4 surfaces a single part.
Any ideas?
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/07964c1f8f82cd21f49f477d/w/7d164a9d1caeb961fb2ec834/e/b536af277e55d8944818443e
Thanks! Your approach (turning it into solid) worked! Thank you also for the model!