Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Smooth blending between two parts
roger_blain
Member Posts: 10 ✭
I have this part, where I need to need to create a smooth transition between the parts. I have tried various methods, and keep ending up with chinks missing.
I need to have the part machined, and don't want these gaps machined into the part.
Any ideas?
Here is the link to my project:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3a718191eadfe8f03f24048e/w/d3099d26b7a842a9d19efd48/e/90c24cd5407f7885f1371c94
I need to have the part machined, and don't want these gaps machined into the part.
Any ideas?
Here is the link to my project:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3a718191eadfe8f03f24048e/w/d3099d26b7a842a9d19efd48/e/90c24cd5407f7885f1371c94
0
Best Answer
-
Alex_Kempen Member Posts: 248 EDUHere's one method, using some 3D fit splines and surface lofts to generate a smooth transition. There's definitely better ways to do what I did, but it's hard to be more efficient since your model isn't fully constrained and has multiple broken features. If you want a more optimized solution, I would suggest fixing it up first. Otherwise, it's garbage in, garbage out, and there's only so much people will be able to do to help you.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3147daba19e6fe8c5333612f/w/60f6b5f6ff2524c6d71355c8/e/b10f5c9166e46d5bf365e226
CS Student at UT DallasAlex.Kempen@utdallas.eduCheck out my FeatureScripts here:1
Answers
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3147daba19e6fe8c5333612f/w/60f6b5f6ff2524c6d71355c8/e/b10f5c9166e46d5bf365e226
https://learn.onshape.com/catalog?labels=%5B%22Self-Paced%20Courses%22%5D&values=%5B%22All%22%5D
Learn more about the Gospel of Christ ( Here )
CADSharp - We make custom features and integrated Onshape apps! Learn How to FeatureScript Here 🔴
There's a new cloud app in the Onshape App Store called Phi that specialises in freeform design. I gave this problem a try and I created a short (2 minutes) video showing how you could tackle it with Phi. I am not sure if this is exactly what you were after, I chose one approach that seemed reasonable to me but you could probably also try other ways. If you want to learn more about Phi you could have a look at the material on the product web site: https://phi3d.com/ .
So the suggestion would be to shorten the one part as shown in the video, and then place the join that was designed in Phi in between the two blocks. Alternatively you can of course also build a freeform joint as the two parts are currently, but it may not have an ideal shape.
I hope this may be of help,
Stephanos
PS. Full disclosure, I'm part of the team that created Phi, so apologies if this counts as self-promotion :-)
The main thing about this way is that it uses all PLANAR surfaces. It starts with flat surfaces, near half rounds and holes. Then fillets. The primary tool was extrude. Loft was not used. So everything is easily defined
The main surfaces lineup pretty close to what you have
But I did use different size fillets, for a different take on your part
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/3437b508bc3b373ccdd7bf80/w/e58357f2ae6c0a05a597991b/e/6bc27960c9f460533a926e83
Look in Assembly for a comparison between the original part and the alternate
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/fa47616ec0d6c2dac4c481db/w/0f92d938c8cdd94cf3b3c528/e/aa9aa62bc7b2d726ed2b2c00
I took a look at your URL again. And I noticed you were taking a PLANAR approach
I played around with my document. Boiled it down to 20 features
You might like the geometry on this one because it’s pretty clean and this time I used the same radius sizes that you had
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/736ffd4b2035a8b614bb2fa0/w/c7bf6d15e884b1cd84456400/e/3104fd3ac2932bc1b800ceae