Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best practice for arranging parts if an assembly along an axus
mark_nahabedian
Member Posts: 31 ✭
What is the best practice for arranging a number of parts along an axis?
I'm trying to illustrate an assembly that includes a nut, bolt, washers and two parts each with a hole in it.
If like to constraint these all to be coaxial, and ideally, to constrain their order on that axis.
I don't seem to be able to add them all to a single slider constraint.
Is there a way to define a construction line to serve as the axis and mate to that?
Also, I seem to be having trouble identifying exactly what I want to mate to in the user interface. I also find the descriptions in the mate connectors list of a mate to be inadequate. Fir example, the origin appears as "mate connectors" rather than "origin".
What is the best practice for what I expect us a common construction?
Thanks.
I'm trying to illustrate an assembly that includes a nut, bolt, washers and two parts each with a hole in it.
If like to constraint these all to be coaxial, and ideally, to constrain their order on that axis.
I don't seem to be able to add them all to a single slider constraint.
Is there a way to define a construction line to serve as the axis and mate to that?
Also, I seem to be having trouble identifying exactly what I want to mate to in the user interface. I also find the descriptions in the mate connectors list of a mate to be inadequate. Fir example, the origin appears as "mate connectors" rather than "origin".
What is the best practice for what I expect us a common construction?
Thanks.
0
Answers
Here is a quick example. https://cad.onshape.com/documents/bf980114dad92dc6c954117d/w/0e0f5c86cc39c52bb658bd6f/e/c875ad1b9afdabd8b02cdb13
You can also apply linear relationships to the slider mates after if the parts need to move at a specific ratio.
If I fully make the parts in my assembly, is there a way to control which mates are "relaxed" when exploding? I'd like for all of the parts to stay on axis.
If you mated two parts together and they are concentric, once you make the exploded view they will remain concentric unless you move from side to side or rotate the part.
I've not tried exploded view yet. I'm still putting the assembly together (my third attempt).
Here's the link:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/f48e803da02ee71496c21d22/w/a8f24e76c9466e030d59ab2f/e/02f35201c256c3eb657809db
The relevant assembly is "try again". The others are previous and partial attempts. That assembly is missing the nut and the four wedges. How the wedges fit can be seen in the "strut and wedges" assembly.
It's intended as a strong joint between the leg and cross beam of a portable bench for hand woodworking. I made one joint for real and it's really rigid. The idea is that the two struts form a tight joint as they're drawn together by the mut and bolt.
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/66d2613d7744f40927caad8d/w/755bb53d3d76630b88032af2/e/6696ac65f69766a1b2da36a4
Thanks much for all your help.