Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

Mechanically-sloped platform

emerson_amaya607emerson_amaya607 Member Posts: 2
I want to create a platform that can raise and lower from 4 corners. I have made a few attempts but they don't seem to work. I have tried ball mates and cylindrical mates, they can raise and lower all 4 at once, but cannot "pitch" the platform.

doc link:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/ecada354219c1722cab9b4cc/w/0b795d298ae6a2147689955f/e/7b02c3ac3b67e1951de598d3?renderMode=0&uiState=6255acd5aa34676ff2fa3075

Comments

  • SethFSethF Member Posts: 130 PRO
    edited April 2022
    I think the issue is that you don't have enough degrees of freedom in your design. With those four pistons all facing straight up, as you try to tilt the platform, you're trying to turn the flat treadmill into a hypotenuse, which of course is longer than the leg of the triangle it started as. So either your pistons need to tilt around, or move around in x,y directions, or you could get real fancy and make your platform expandable.
  • EvanReeseEvanReese Member, Mentor Posts: 2,096 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2022
    Seth is right, it's an issue with the geometry, not Onshape. Here's one solution, though it might not be what you're looking for, as it would want to fall over unless the ball joints have a way to hold still. Something I've seen for these applications is a Hexapod.

    Evan Reese
  • steve_shubinsteve_shubin Member Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2022
    @emerson_amaya607

    Here is another way

    This method keeps the pistons locked in the upright position, BUT, to do this,
    you would have to alter the design of the J-shaped brackets so that they would work in some sliding motion

    The sliding motion is only set up to work on the right side for now

    The J-shaped brackets on the left are still FASTENED, in this GIF




    I did it by putting a slider mate in the closest corner
    And by putting a cylindrical mate in the upper right corner



    The ghosted Items above (in the red box)  were not moving in sync with the rest of the platform,
    so I just ghosted them

    You will need to work on getting them to move with the rest of the platform


  • steve_shubinsteve_shubin Member Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭✭
    @emerson_amaya607

    https://cad.onshape.com/documents/5ced1dff79ae8f7c34c1b192/w/ca1ff0694bc0499012134604/e/3f730fac6f1f00d8580d3af9

    This will allow for the deck to be at any angle in 3D space. Of course with respect to the limits of how far the pistons can extend or contract

    BUT, at least 3 of the J brackets would have to be redesigned for this setup

    All the pistons are locked in vertical position

    One piston is fastened at the top

    Another has a slider mate at top

    The remaining 2 have planar mates and are parallel to each other

    So this would allow for the same size deck and vertical pistons, but it would require different ways of connecting the pistons to the deck

  • steve_shubinsteve_shubin Member Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭✭
    Using the above method, each piston can be set to a different height, with all pistons locked in the vertical position, and with the bottom of each cylinder also locked into position





Sign In or Register to comment.