Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Is there any way to wrap a spiral around a spline defined revolved surface?
robert_lilly
Member Posts: 10 ✭
I'm trying to define a spiral cooling channel in a rocket nozzle. This is strictly a CAD exercise - I'm trying to sketch up the thrust chamber and nozzle of the LR-101 Vernier rocket engine. I think I understand how to do this using a spiral defined path followed by a sweep of a disc. Unfortunately the spiral can only be defined on cylindrical and conical surfaces. Is there any way to get a spiral to wrap around spline defined revolved surface. This area is the throat of a supersonic nozzle, so it's converging then diverging.
I was thinking about cutting this section in half, then trying to project a flat spiral (and there's a great discussion somewhere on the forum here on how to generate a flat spiral in the first place) onto the surface...but I don't see how to make the project fro the flat sketch onto the spline defined surface.
Do folks have any suggestions how I might proceed? Thanks, Bob
I was thinking about cutting this section in half, then trying to project a flat spiral (and there's a great discussion somewhere on the forum here on how to generate a flat spiral in the first place) onto the surface...but I don't see how to make the project fro the flat sketch onto the spline defined surface.
Do folks have any suggestions how I might proceed? Thanks, Bob
Tagged:
0
Best Answers
-
andrew_troup Member, Mentor Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭✭✭If you generate a helix (based on a cylinder) and they sweep a radial line up it to produce a helical surface (like an auger) and intersect that surface with a revolved surface sharing the same central axis .... would that give you what you want? (As a path for sweeping your "disk"?)
If so, I can go into more detail on the procedure.7 -
nav Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭✭Hi @robert_lilly share your document and post the link here.
for the video gif I use http://www.cockos.com/licecap/
for screen grab I use Press Command (⌘)-Shift-4. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201361Nicolas Ariza V.
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions5 -
nav Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭✭Modify the helix as is not entirely contained in the thrust chamber you get an error when using the split command.
Nicolas Ariza V.
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions5 -
nav Member Posts: 258 ✭✭✭✭is something like this what you´re trying to model ?
Nicolas Ariza V.
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions6
Answers
If so, I can go into more detail on the procedure.
...I'm speechless...that's brilliant! At least, if it works. I had not thought of creating the auger then INTERSECTING it with the desired surface. Rueful smile. You are crafty. I'll try it on my own, but when you get this I suspect all I need is how to do the surface intersection.
Bob
A bit of a head bending experience, but I did create the auger. So cool. Reminds me of my complex calculus class way back in the 90's (talking about Riemann surfaces and such, which is pretty close to an Auger - as I remember). Anyway, if you get a moment to share how to do the intersection bit - because I have no idea.
B
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
The easiest way is probably to use whichever surface overlaps the other surface to split that surface (using "Split" feature).
If you like, you can use "Delete Part" to get rid of the excess surface (in @nav's case, it would be the outer part of the auger) to get easier visibility of the split edge at the intersection (again, in the case shown in the graphic) with the revolved surface (which you can hide), and that edge can be selected to act as your path.
So (everybody), please forgive the messy screen grab. I've gotten myself into a pickle on this. The items in question are in red and blue. I recreated the auger (had it stuck inside the defining cylinder first). Reworked it so the spiral surface extends beyond the defining cylinder. Lovely.
It won't let me split the spline defined revolution with the spiral surface (says the geometry is incorrectly generated), and in the other direction it appears to be an invalid selection. Trying to cut back on the spiral surface using delete wipes out the auger in its entirety.
Suggestions? Again, what I am ultimately after is the trace that spiral leaves on the spline defined revolution (in blue).
B
The surface doing the splitting of the other surface needs to either overlap it at BOTH ends (or be strictly flush)
It's not possible to see from your graphic if that's the case, also it's possible your blue surface is actually a solid (again, can't tell)
It should preferably be a surface, (it could possibly be a single face of a solid, but I haven't got a good handle on that yet)
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
Thanks for that, good to know it works in practice as well as theory!
If the auger was at least as long as the revolved surface, you should be able to use it as the splitting surface.
If they both ended exactly flush, either surface could be used to split the other.
Unfortunately, I am still stuck. I reworked the "surface to be divided", i.e. spline defined revolved surface .. it had been a solid, as you speculated. The auger is larger than the spline defined revolved surface. It doesn't work. The diagnostic says the surface is unable to split the part.
I don't know how to post my models cleanly like nav does, but I will share the document with you. Perhaps you can enlighten? (It is a bit dark in here, still).
Thanks,
Bob
for the video gif I use http://www.cockos.com/licecap/
for screen grab I use Press Command (⌘)-Shift-4. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201361
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/9def4ef0771b40d398859822/w/b27a2dc56aca4e4ab456f910/e/8c9c6a56099f4497a2685bff
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
Well, to be precise, a "wire" will follow the spiral on the blue surface. A second layer will follow on top of it. I"ve grabbed an image off the internet, just to show you what I'm hope to draw:
So you see that the whole point of the spiral is to guide the wire (i.e. I'll be sweeping a disc to represent the wire). The actual cooling channel was defined by the space between the loops of wire.
Bob
So you are telling me that the helix should NOT extend beyond the spline defined revolved surface? Err... I had thought Andrew told me that it needed to extended beyond the surface to be cut. I'll try (I see you've already figured it out)....
B
Indaer -- Aircraft Lifecycle Solutions
Yea, pretty close. Except that, as you can tell from the photo of the LR-101, that cooling channel has go all the way through throat and the nozzle. Harrumph. Well, I'll get this beasty. I'm an obvious newbie with CAD, but even at my advanced age, I still have my dreams.... (Thanks Nic, and Andrew too!) - B
Well no, I didn't say (or mean) that. Apologies if I was unclear, I guess I was trying to be concise.
Here's a dotting i's and crossing t's version of what I actually said :
Regardless of which surface (call it A) you are using to split the other surface (call it B ) into two surfaces :
Surface A needs to be at least flush, or longer, than Surface B, at both ends.
It is an open question whether surface A should be the helix or the revolved surface.
But in the first graphic @nav posted, which I referred to, in illustration of my point, because it was the only graphic available at the time showing a clear overlap at either end : the natural choice to use as the splitting surface A (by my rule) would be the revolved spline, and in fact his subsequent graphic :
https://us.v-cdn.net/5022071/uploads/editor/c2/q28afm3i0wtd.gif
makes it clear that it only worked when he did it that way round, in accordance with my proposed rule.
(In other words, it only worked when he split the auger, which he called "weird", suggesting it was contrary to what his intuition suggested)
HTH