Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

Align two parts

kevin_mcquownkevin_mcquown Member Posts: 2
I have two different cubes of different sizes.  Each is a separate part in the same part studio.  How to I align the corner of the smaller cube directly on top of a corner on the bigger cube?

Comments

  • andrew_troupandrew_troup Member, Mentor Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The best (or simplest) approach in a part studio is to model the bodies in the locations you require from the start.

    To do this in your example, you would start a sketch on one face of the bigger cube, and locate the first corner of the sketched square coincident with the existing corner of the bigger cube.

    If you cannot do this, you could use "Transform" to translate the smaller cube to the desired position, but this would require either working from measurements (not very satisfactory) or (preferably) creating Mate Connectors, one whose "parent" is the bigger cube, and the other the smaller.

    See help for "Transform by Mate Connectors" 
    https://cad.onshape.com/help/#transform.htm?TocPath=Modeling%20in%20Onshape|Part%20Studio|Feature%20Tools|_____16
  • philip_thomasphilip_thomas Member, Moderator, Onshape Employees, Developers Posts: 1,381
    Transform by line/points and then selecting the two corners works too. :)

    Philip Thomas - Onshape
  • andrew_troupandrew_troup Member, Mentor Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2015
    @philip_thomas 's suggestion would serve the OP's purpose nicely, provided he has no need to reorient the small cube.
    A second transform would be necessary if he did.

    The Mate Connector method is quite muscular, because the reorientation options are nicely editable, enabling the user to simply flip through the possibilities. But there is also clear merit in the "Transform by line/points" approach, and I was wrong, and gave a misleading description, in dismissing it.
  • kevin_mcquownkevin_mcquown Member Posts: 2
    Thanks everyone, I'll give that a try and great advice!

Sign In or Register to comment.