Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

Can I import a part to use as a negative extrude in the face of another part, for a tight fit?

chris_fonteschris_fontes Member Posts: 6
Im new to CAD (approx 10-15hrs of onshape) and starting to get the hang of onshape but I'm stuck. Couldn't find a good tutorial accomplishing a similar design. I'm trying to make a tool tray for long hex sockets. I was thinking there's a way to parts design each socket, then import each one to the part design of a tray and use the sockets to cut away the face of the tray for a snug fit. Closest I got was with the Detrived tool but I not sure how to fully use that tool. Thanks for any advice or helpful links.  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/ce063455a385560504816b05/w/b3469b15e7ad7978c403cea0/e/bf5c3fea06cede31fcb4a972

Best Answers

Answers

  • David_YL_NguyenDavid_YL_Nguyen Member, Onshape Employees Posts: 119
    Answer ✓
    Hey @chris_fontes,

    You can use the Boolean function to subtract one part from another. After that you can pattern it.

    https://cad.onshape.com/documents/38933a2adb515d52f6b68a84/w/cfee39bd2fe0495ab26a843a/e/217fa3f1c5f5869a8b761558
  • eric_pestyeric_pesty Member Posts: 1,891 PRO
    Answer ✓
    You could also use an assembly with you part and the sockets, and then do an "in context edit" and use the boolean on that, it would be faster than deriving in and transforming each one.

    I would suggest using the "offset" option in the boolean tool to add a bit of clearance so parts fit nicely.
  • chris_fonteschris_fontes Member Posts: 6
    thank you. I will try that out
  • nick_papageorge073nick_papageorge073 Member, csevp Posts: 831 PRO
    The in context edit mentioned above is the most efficient way.

    However, do you really need to model the sockets at all? If all you need is round holes to hold the sockets, you can just do that with a sketch of varying sized circles and a single extrude. If on the other hand you want to learn how to do this, and/or you want to model "all" of your tools and arrange them optimally on a tray, then in-contrxt is well worth knowing.
  • chris_fonteschris_fontes Member Posts: 6
    Well my first issue, that I didn't explain, was that I couldn't figure out how to lay the sockets flat, not standing up. I figured out that I need to model them on the face plane. Then derive, transform xyz. 
  • eric_pestyeric_pesty Member Posts: 1,891 PRO
    Well my first issue, that I didn't explain, was that I couldn't figure out how to lay the sockets flat, not standing up. I figured out that I need to model them on the face plane. Then derive, transform xyz. 
    It doesn't matter how you model them you can use the transform to lay them flat as well, same if you used the assembly approach. 
    Have you tried the "transform by mate connector" option? It lets you position things exactly where you want them in one step.
  • chris_fonteschris_fontes Member Posts: 6
    I did not. I have no clue how to use 70% of the tools. I'm enjoying the learning process here and will definitely try that out. But I think the tool tray came out great. https://cad.onshape.com/documents/ce063455a385560504816b05/w/b3469b15e7ad7978c403cea0/e/bf5c3fea06cede31fcb4a972 
Sign In or Register to comment.