Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Parallel mate with angular limit
Hi all, I am trying to replicate a rod end bearing assembly, and want to limit the side face of the ball to 5 degrees of movement with reference to the rod end housing side face. I am using a parallel mate, and in the limits part am putting -5 and 5 in the angular limit fields. However it seems to lock the ball in place with the faces parallel, so I am clearly not understanding the way this works.
I assumed that the parallel mate angular limit would constrain the maximum difference in angles between the two faces, is that the right interpretation, or should I be using a different mate type?
Cheers
I assumed that the parallel mate angular limit would constrain the maximum difference in angles between the two faces, is that the right interpretation, or should I be using a different mate type?
Cheers
0
Comments
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/175a06e981c4096daeb1b02f/w/df3db5253b1fb2bae6bc09cb/e/b52e28a69f869ed68f2c9a98
a picture or link to public cad doc would help to understand what you're really looking to achieve.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUVFq7tixKM
I have a knock on question, having successfully made the assembly with the limiting mate. When I import that assembly into another higher level assembly, which in itself is then incorporated into an assembly. The mate limit no longer seems to be working, although the ball mate is effective. Is it necessary to repeat the mate in the higher level assembly?
Cheers
Les