Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Any suggestions to help me improve in my project ?
efrain_cruz
Member Posts: 4 EDU
It's a street vendors fruit cart carrier. I'm thinking of building it in real life here's the link
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/f5eccd8020d996656ad6490a/w/d05f7a0fb23fb895e70ccdeb/e/8ddd991b8fe403271b8ee8b9?renderMode=0&uiState=66620bd98d6c957f4b21740e
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/f5eccd8020d996656ad6490a/w/d05f7a0fb23fb895e70ccdeb/e/8ddd991b8fe403271b8ee8b9?renderMode=0&uiState=66620bd98d6c957f4b21740e
0
Best Answer
-
robert_scott_jr_ Member Posts: 485 ✭✭✭Hello Efrain. The approach I would take would be to make use of multiple part studios and assemblies. In your document I imagine it much less productive and perhaps frustrating sifting through the extensive feature tree and the parts list to find an item to edit. On the same note, naming features and parts would certainly help. Having multiple part studios and creating at least one assembly would make it so much more manageable with less angst.
Concerning the design itself, the cart may be more maneuverable with the handle on the opposite end.
- Scotty0
Answers
Concerning the design itself, the cart may be more maneuverable with the handle on the opposite end.
- Scotty