Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Sweep/revolve should auto-resolve intersections
peter_zhang678
Member Posts: 2 EDU
Currently, revolve and sweep don't work when there are intersecting parts. I understand this is expected behavior and that you can get around it manually with extra steps.
My feature-request is: onshape should just auto resolve this without requiring manual workarounds.
This has no risk of breaking existing models, since currently anything intersecting is invalid.
Example: Suppose I want to sweep a profile along this path.
Auto sweep fails to generate because the corner radius is too tight and causes overlapping.
However, the preview is already exactly what I want, as long as the intersecting areas are ignored/union'ed into everything else. As a user, I would want onshape to at least attempt a best-effort resolution -- since failing outright is useful in 0% of cases.
My feature-request is: onshape should just auto resolve this without requiring manual workarounds.
This has no risk of breaking existing models, since currently anything intersecting is invalid.
Example: Suppose I want to sweep a profile along this path.
Auto sweep fails to generate because the corner radius is too tight and causes overlapping.
However, the preview is already exactly what I want, as long as the intersecting areas are ignored/union'ed into everything else. As a user, I would want onshape to at least attempt a best-effort resolution -- since failing outright is useful in 0% of cases.
1
Comments
Can you add this as a feature request? I want this too