Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
How to make sketch entities coincident with cylinder
Henk_de_Vlaam
Member, Developers Posts: 241 ✭✭✭
Below you see a sketch and a cilindrical part in a part studio.
I like to align (make coincident) the yellow sketch line with the arrowed red edge of the cilinder.
I'm trying to select the cilinders edge but do not succeed.
A workaround is to use the (red) edge for a construction sketch line, but that introduces an extra entity.
Is there a more direct way of aligning?
I like to align (make coincident) the yellow sketch line with the arrowed red edge of the cilinder.
I'm trying to select the cilinders edge but do not succeed.
A workaround is to use the (red) edge for a construction sketch line, but that introduces an extra entity.
Is there a more direct way of aligning?
Henk de Vlaam (NL)
0
Best Answer
-
bruce_williams Member, Developers Posts: 842 EDU@H_d_V
Good question. You can only constrain to sketch entities and the cylinder is a part not a sketch entity. You could Use (convert/project) the edge as a construction line and then constrain to that. As you say that adds an entity, however construction entities are often useful and necessary. HOWEVER, depending on your design intent, you could Use (convert) the edge as your line. See the video attached. I also demonstrate closing the gap between the parts.
www.accuratepattern.com6
Answers
Good question. You can only constrain to sketch entities and the cylinder is a part not a sketch entity. You could Use (convert/project) the edge as a construction line and then constrain to that. As you say that adds an entity, however construction entities are often useful and necessary. HOWEVER, depending on your design intent, you could Use (convert) the edge as your line. See the video attached. I also demonstrate closing the gap between the parts.