Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Issue with Shell when thickness is bigger than 0,03 inch
alain_ciotta
Member Posts: 4 ✭
This is my public design:
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/58ea84ac604d230f769d4631/w/f4d42a9b3a07d5488a1a7e7e/e/761640a13e4f517e5410db22
Look for the tab: Torso v3
When you look to Torso v3, the part looks perfect. The issue I am facing is that every time I increase the thickness of the Shell above 0.03 inch, the part becomes a block and not halo anymore.
The ideal thickness will be 0.2 inch. How can I do that
PS: This part is needed for the STEM project for the VexIQ Worldcome
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/58ea84ac604d230f769d4631/w/f4d42a9b3a07d5488a1a7e7e/e/761640a13e4f517e5410db22
Look for the tab: Torso v3
When you look to Torso v3, the part looks perfect. The issue I am facing is that every time I increase the thickness of the Shell above 0.03 inch, the part becomes a block and not halo anymore.
The ideal thickness will be 0.2 inch. How can I do that
PS: This part is needed for the STEM project for the VexIQ Worldcome
0
Answers
https://cad.onshape.com/documents/58f5e0e66ac18f1078f5c8be/w/7f6385ea32bd3ee2ca093016/e/48fcf6ddc162fb1dfda9d09c
The principle was to:-
(1) Make a boolen tool that is the negative of the part including the small details that cause the shell to fail.
(2) Delete the faces causing the problems.
(3) Shell to whatever thickness you wish
(4) Use the boolean tool from 1 to put the features back in.
Told you it was a bodge
I presume you'd need to bash some of the faces to make holes deeper. I'm sure with some reordering of features there's a much nicer way of doing it!
Cheers, Owen S
HWM-Water Ltd