Enclose Surfaces Question

Answers

• MDesign Member Posts: 1,139 PRO

  September 30 Answer ✓

  

  You can see where potential problems are with either the curve analysis tool (select a surface then shift+c) or for a quick check you can orient the lighting on the surface to see how smoothly it transitions across edges. here are two examples (there may be more) where its probably and issue for the thicken/shell operations. When the surface abrubtly changes from convex to concave you are almost always going to have issues.

  0
• GregBrown Member, Onshape Employees, csevp, pcbaevp Posts: 352

  September 30 Answer ✓

  Your Loft 3 feature has too much going on (too many boundary conditions) - trying to get the profile shape and the tight blends along the edge is not the “best practice”. I’ll take a look later when I get a chance. There are also some great learning center guides/tutorials out there for suggested surfacing practices. The primary one here will be to “build to theoretical sharps” then blend back in a second step….

  0
• MDesign Member Posts: 1,139 PRO

  September 30 Answer ✓

  

  When your profiles intersect like this, its asking for troubles down the road as well. Set those magnitude lines colinear and/or tangent to related geometry and you'll have much cleaner surfaces from which to do operations like thicken as well. For reference this is on your very first sketch profile. Pay close attention to where those magnitude lines are or are not parallel, normal, tangent to other geometry to create smooth surfaces.

  0
• tracy_fleming Member Posts: 10 EDU

  September 30

  Thanks for all the input. I think I need to get back to the basics and review more tutorials on surface modeling to build more foundational knowledge. Sorry to waste anyone's time when I haven't yet done enough homework on my own. I have already adjusted the shape in the master document, and I think I keep falling into the trap of starting too complicated geometry. I will try to simplify the shape first and then work up to the more complicated geometry.

  Much appreciated, but let's close this thread for now. I'll keep learning.

  0
• MDesign Member Posts: 1,139 PRO

  September 30

  https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/comment/121718#Comment_121718

  These 2 are great places to start.
  
  https://learn.onshape.com/learn/course/introduction-to-surfacing
  
  https://learn.onshape.com/learn/course/onshape-surface-modeling

  0
• tracy_fleming Member Posts: 10 EDU

  October 1

  Thank you, MDesign!

  0
• tracy_fleming Member Posts: 10 EDU

  October 2

  Hello again folks, Thank you so much for pointing out the resources previously. I have spent a considerable amount of time in the learning resources and I've made a great deal of progress on this surface model and am almost there. What I have now would actually work functionally, but I am still struggling a bit to smooth the edges between my surface lofts on this model: (New Document)

  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d107c06dbf503282765211d4/w/dbdb6e2ef908dffa99f00337/e/105e3a3e38858a8ca2d9c5b0

  Could anyone possibly give me some guidance on how to match the tangency, or possibly the curvatures between my lofts in this model? See image below for problem areas. It is where my loft edges meet. I can get the start profile conditions set with match tangency, which smooths the bottom edge of the lofts pretty well, but none of the end profile conditions work.

  

  Do I need another pair of loft guide curves along the raised edges as shown below in green or something?

  

  0
• martin_kopplow Member Posts: 987 PRO

  October 2

  That's hard to see just from the pictures. I can not load your model (is is public?), but in such cases, a set of well placed guide curves may help. If you made this in several steps (as opposed to one big loft all over it), it might be worth while looking at the start and end conditions.

  Sometimes, when the result comes out too much potato shaped, it helps creating a more defined looking surface, if the loft is done in portions. In this case this could mean to loft the two middle sections first. Once you have these and are satisfied with how the surface runs, then create the end caps with a tangent end condition. Trying to do all in one go usually introduces too many conditions to propely control.

  And one more thing: If the part is symmetrical, only do one side and later mirror. That makes it easier. Use helper geometry to define tangency.

  Sample:

  

  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/9259412b987d2d79c19c4ec7/w/98c1b2f3f1ed3e1560cb0185/e/3d4357348a5897dc7843878e?renderMode=7&uiState=68de56503e22c53c084f3810

  0
• tracy_fleming Member Posts: 10 EDU

  October 2 edited October 2

  Thank you Martin, I'm sorry I had forgotten to make the document Public. I have now done that I you'd like to take another look. I did in fact model only one side as it is symmetrical across the centerline, but it is not symmetrical from front to back so I only mirror it across the centerline. I did use guidelines but I have a couple of wave like features running down each side of the part , thinking that it might add some rigidity.

  I was also not able to get your document to load so I couldn't reference it. Again thank you for your suggestions, but I'm still a bit stuck trying to smooth the connection points between the individual surfaces.

  My new public document is here:

  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d107c06dbf503282765211d4/w/dbdb6e2ef908dffa99f00337/e/105e3a3e38858a8ca2d9c5b0

  0
• tracy_fleming Member Posts: 10 EDU

  October 2 edited October 2

  BY JOVE, I THINK I'VE GOT IT! Thank you for guiding me along this path (pun intended). I added in a longitudinal guide for the individual lofts at the shoulder and the problem resolved in that area. I think I'll add another guide and I'll have a pretty reasonable surface. I still wish I could get the End Profile Conditions to work without erroring.

  Zebra Curves don't look so great but at least I don't have distinct edges between my lofts along the shoulder where I added the shoulder guide any longer. I will try the last guide piercing my curves and see if that finally cleans it up. It would work as is, but I have to keep trying to get it clean.

  Thank you folks, this is a great community!

  1
• martin_kopplow Member Posts: 987 PRO

  October 3 edited October 3

  Hi @tracy_fleming . Ooops, I probably moved the document to trash together with another after my experiment. Try again. It should work now.

  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/9259412b987d2d79c19c4ec7/w/98c1b2f3f1ed3e1560cb0185/e/3d4357348a5897dc7843878e?renderMode=7&uiState=68de56503e22c53c084f3810

  I also looked at your model. It works in principle, though it might help to avoid overstretched or self intersecting areas when you could put the profile sketches at an angle:

  

  I edited your profile sketches slightly so the grooves run smoother and I took care of them having about the same number of vertex points, and added 'connections' between these in the center part of the loft. That makes everything look more parallel and more elegant. Also, I added tangency where the lofts meet at "Top Loft Guide" 1 and 2 .

  There are, however issues with tangency in your basic sketches. These prevent the tangency in the loft to work accurately, for that forces the surface into a non-tangent edge at that point:

  

  After adjusting that, it looks much smoother:

  

  https://cad.onshape.com/documents/8d53fc6c0cf8c20d83a8d446/w/29201a0dbca767bf5025bb59/e/00d2623c73ff831a1334b999?renderMode=0&tangentEdgeStyle=1&uiState=68df9955b366198782fedcd1

  Because of the somewhat overstretched surface (due to vertical profile sketches as mentioned above) there will be downstream issues e.g. when shelling the whole thing:

  

  So it might be a good idea to rebuild these sketches and take care of a more relaxed surfacing all over. That Yamaha motor cover, however, does in fact consist of a load of distinct surfaces that have been built in a whole different manner.

  0