Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best Of
Re: Two racks one pinion mating
A second rack and pinion should work. Or a linear between the two racks.
Re: Rolled Sheetmetal Part
You'll need to make sure there are flat spots where the circular arc transitions into those T junctions. Onshape's sheet metal can't currently support doubly curved geometry or lofted transitions.
Sequential Part Number
9000-XXXX is for top level master assembly
Weldment Assemblies: 1000
Manufactured Parts: 2000
Sub Assemblies: 3000
Sourced Parts: 4000
Purchased Component: 7000
Spec Components: 8000
Re: Shaded view in break view
I would also like this feature to keep our drawings more consistent
Re: THRU vs Depth holes?
Turns out it is to do with the way Onshape determines what a THRU hole is - it uses some moderately complex logic as to whether a hole goes all the way through a part or not; and in this case I had a U shaped sheet metal piece so that in the folded state it decided they were not through holes because there were more surfaces of the part in the way, though not when flat patterned:
The workaround for now is to make the holes start from the inner face and terminate on the outer face.
I have submitted an improvement request for it to simply follow the design intent (ie. the termination setting) entered by the user:
I appreciate the programmers might've been trying to handle holes not created by the hole tool or something, but sometimes KISS is best - just let the user decide rather than trying to handle it via logic.
Here's a simple example with a bunch of holes defined with only a few hole features, but look at how complex the hole table is…
Re: Threaded Holes made with Hole feature called out for "Up to Next" in drawings
This is what I get from the hole call out when using up to next in the part studio.
Re: Curve Pattern on Spiral with Orientation locked on Circle Center
@EvanReese
I enjoy this too, but I'd love to see some Onshape employees chime in. It really seems like we should be able to solve this problem without using custom features, or tricky patterns. Re-apply feature should be more robust.

Re: Curve Pattern on Spiral with Orientation locked on Circle Center
@Konst_Sh that's fancy! I like that this community is so pumped about Onshape that they keep answering the question after it's been answered because we just can't turn down a CAD challenge.
Re: Curve Pattern on Spiral with Orientation locked on Circle Center
Feature pattern appears to a little buggy and unpredictable ever since the pattern update a few updates back.
You can do this with a single mate connector paired with simplified sketch constraints. But even adding something as simple as a line to centroid seems to break the feature pattern. This is a bug imo since adding a line to the sketch messes with the up-stream mate connector. I've submitted a bug report, we'll see where it goes.
Re: NEW Video series: Expressions in Onshape
I'm trying to trick non-coders into coding without realizing it 🤫