Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Is there any way to updated linked parts in an assembly when the parts have moved to a new document?
tim_hess427
Member Posts: 648 ✭✭✭✭
I had several parts in a single document and used them to build an assembly in other document. After building the assembly, I decided that I wanted to put some of the parts in their own documents (to start building out a part library). However, after moving the parts to their own document, I don't see any way to tell my assembly that the parts still exist, but just in a new location. Is there any way I can link my assembly to the parts in the new document without rebuilding everything manually?
Tagged:
0
Best Answer
-
bradley_sauln Moderator, Onshape Employees, Developers Posts: 373You should at least see a linked document icon on the parts. Even though the link icon is not blue you can right-click to change the reference and Onshape knows that you moved the part to a new document and will give you a link to press to carry the reference over.
5
Answers
Twitter: @bradleysauln
@bradley_sauln and I have just been discussing this. Here is the sequence of events that cause your error:
1. Create part in doc 1
2. Version doc 1
3. Assemble part into doc 2
4. Move part to another doc (3)
5. Version doc 1
6. Assembly shows blue icon
7. Update linked doc - gets your error because the latest version of doc 1 no longer contains the part
At step 7, click on the link as shown in Brad's post above to rectify the issue. It is not clear immediately what the issue is and I agree the wording should be clearer.
Thanks for the help.