Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Select all contraints, and remove them, or..
ts_2
Member Posts: 22 ✭
I think it'd be handy after clicking viewing all constraints, to be able to select them all and delete them, with a few options. Maybe ,
Delete All
Delete Type (delete all horizontal...etc..)
Delete all, but keep Coincident constraint on so the lines and sketches remain connected.
Delete All
Delete Type (delete all horizontal...etc..)
Delete all, but keep Coincident constraint on so the lines and sketches remain connected.
Tagged:
0
Comments
I agree that the constraints at the endpoints of entities where they butt up to another entity should not be deleted: I personally don't think of them as constraints, but junctions, and would prefer they not be displayed when "show constraints" is active, or listed when we get a listing.
Solidworks does not show them, and I've never had cause to wish it did. I suppose it might help if people are sloppy sketching, but I wish their display could be disabled for those who want to know "just the facts, ma'am..."
At present, the difficulty of dealing with constraint auditing and editing is a pretty strong disincentive to put lots of entities in a single sketch.
The way i see it is for example, pick one horizontal relation, press Ctrl + A it selects all parallel relations, on pressing delete it gives you a choice, delete all horizontal relations or delete all relations.
I don't see any use for delete all, since onshape does all the figures with constraints ie. rectangle is just 4 lines constrained to each other. And I like this system since it makes all the shapes highly customizable by deleting some of the preset constraints.
Maybe some categorizing would clear things up. If constraints were divided to system (used in shapes and tools), snap (automatic constraints) and manual (the ones you have actually added) categories with different color icon, it would be a lot easier to find the right coincident to delete in corner of rectangle.
It seems to me to muddy the waters when so many mandatory and unremarkable constraints are lumped in, in an undifferentiated mish-mash, with the constraints which are "interesting".
The latter constraint types I label "interesting" because they are discretionary, and potentially problematic.