Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
In context part studio does not line up in the assy it was created in
nick_papageorge_dayjob
Member, csevp Posts: 851 PRO
Hi all, I just started using in context editing a couple of weeks ago (I was using derived prior), and I really like it. Just yesterday I made my first in-context part studio from an assembly. The first part created in that part studio assembles in the correct place in the assy it came from. But when I create additional parts in that part studio, then insert them into the assembly, they are placed at the origin of the assembly, rather than at the mate connector of the in-context part studio. This means I can't group them, and have to manually mate each part. Is there a way around this that I'm missing?
This is the part studio. Base, top, and pins. The origin is where the mate connector was in the assy.
Thanks all!
0
Answers
This is the specific in our training that references this: https://learn.onshape.com/learn/course/managed-in-context-design/understanding-managed-in-context-design/primary-and-secondary-instances?page=1
Twitter: @bradleysauln
Thank you. I had completed that entire training module a couple of weeks ago. I will look at that section again and try again. I'll report back later if that clears it up for me.
The workaround is to use the featurescript "mate connector at origin" on the parts in a studio. Then, I mate that MC to the MC in the assembly used to create the in-context part studio. Its a few extra steps, but its rock solid in reliability. I've had issue with Grouped components moving around on me with changes, and try to avoid group entirely now.