Editing logic breaking reference to variables in array parameter?

MichaelPascoe

Both of these custom features have array parameters: Texture & Freeform Spline. Input variables are lost when a new array item is added. Is there a way to fix this?

@Evan_Reese, you may be interested in the solution to this if there is one.

Alex_Kempen

The value of sortXReturned (and sortYReturned and so on) should have no bearing on whether your variables are getting overridden. Rather, it's the statement definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x that's tripping you up, since that's setting the value of definition.groups[g].sizeX to the saved value of definition.groups[g].sizeX, which doesn't include the necessary variable information, even if the values are technically the same. The solution, therefore, is only to override the variables when the override value is actually different from the input value:

// if definition.groups[g].sizeX is already the correct value, leave it alone!
// if storeSizes.x is zero and autoScale.x is different from definition.groups[g].sizeX:
if (storeSizes.x == 0 && !tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, autoScale.x))
{
   definition.groups[g].sizeX = autoScale.x;
}
else if (!tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, storeSizes.x))
{
    definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x; 
}

Don't forget to repeat the following code for sizeY and sizeZ as well.

Evan_Reese

yes! this is pretty important and I've not found a solution if there is one. Thanks for asking about it. 

MichaelPascoe

I think it has something to do with edit logic. Multi Variable also contains an array parameter, however it works as expected.

Alex_Kempen

I would imagine its the result of setting a new value of the parameter that matches the value of the old parameter unnecessarily. Depending on your conditions, running the editing logic with a sufficient condition (like adding a new array parameter) is enough to break the references.
To prevent this from happening, add conditions to shield parameters from being updated unless they actually need a new value:

if (!tolerantEquals(newValue, oldValue))
{
   // arrayParameter = newValue;
}

I suppose this behavior could actually be used desirably to selectively break variable references or move variables to an internal parameter. Of course, that's a very specific use case, but you never know.

MichaelPascoe

Perhaps I used it improperly, or it didn't work. @Alex_Kempen

Near line 3201 in the Texture feature:

             if (!tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, oldDefinition.groups[g].sizeX))
                    {
                        if (oldDefinition.groups[g].sizeX == .999 * inch || definition.groups[g].sortX == Sort.PLUS_Y)
                        {
                            if (storeSizes.x == 0) // if scale has not been used, use auto scale
                            {
                                definition.groups[g].sizeX = autoScale.x;
                            }
                            else // if scale has been used, use the last stored value
                            {
                                definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x;
                            }
                        }
                    }

Alex_Kempen

So basically, you don't want to set definition.groups[g].sizeX to anything unless that change is actually required (i.e. the user has dragged a manipulator, so the variable needs to be overridden). So I would put the tolerant condition around definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x specifically, comparing definition.groups[g].sizeX and storeSizes.x. You could also just not have that condition at all, since storeSizes.x is presumably always the same as definition.groups[g].sizeX in the first place. 

Also, as a more general note, using 0.999 * inch as the indicator for whether the feature has been scaled is low key not great. I would recommend using a hidden map to store that information instead - it should be more reliable and silent to the user.

MichaelPascoe

Turns out it's breaking it in 3 different spots. line 3158, 3195, and 3206. All of these are in the editing logic function.

I don't care too much about the name of the config so I can simply delete code at line 3158. However, I do not want to get rid of the functionality from lines 3195 and 3206. I have tried placing them in an if statement so that they only return if something has changed, however if they return at all, they break the previous groups reference to the users variables.

Line 3158, name is changed in edit logic then returned to the hidden parameter above.

                        for (var g = 0; g < size(definition.groups); g += 1)
                        {
                            definition.groups[g].name = "Configuration" ~ " " ~ toString(g + 1);
                        }

Line 3195

                        if (oldDefinition.groups[g].sizeX == .999 * inch || definition.groups[g].sortX == Sort.PLUS_Y)
                        {
                            if (storeSizes.x == 0) // if scale has not been used, use auto scale
                            {
                                definition.groups[g].sizeX = autoScale.x;
                            }
                            else // if scale has been used, use the last stored value
                            {
                                definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x;
                            }
                        }<br>

Line 3206

                        if (oldDefinition.groups[g].sortX != definition.groups[g].sortX)
                        {
                            definition.groups[g].sortXReturned = definition.groups[g].sortX;
                        }

Alex_Kempen

The value of sortXReturned (and sortYReturned and so on) should have no bearing on whether your variables are getting overridden. Rather, it's the statement definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x that's tripping you up, since that's setting the value of definition.groups[g].sizeX to the saved value of definition.groups[g].sizeX, which doesn't include the necessary variable information, even if the values are technically the same. The solution, therefore, is only to override the variables when the override value is actually different from the input value:

// if definition.groups[g].sizeX is already the correct value, leave it alone!
// if storeSizes.x is zero and autoScale.x is different from definition.groups[g].sizeX:
if (storeSizes.x == 0 && !tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, autoScale.x))
{
   definition.groups[g].sizeX = autoScale.x;
}
else if (!tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, storeSizes.x))
{
    definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x; 
}

Don't forget to repeat the following code for sizeY and sizeZ as well.

MichaelPascoe

Thanks @Alex_Kempen for your patience and all of the troubleshooting and teaching!

Here is the code that seems to be working, I will need to tweak it some more:

if (storeSizes.x == 0 && !tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, autoScale.x))
{
     definition.groups[g].sizeX = autoScale.x;
}
else if (oldDefinition.groups[g].sizeX == .999 * inch && !tolerantEquals(definition.groups[g].sizeX, storeSizes.x))
{
     definition.groups[g].sizeX = storeSizes.x;
}