Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Comments
Yes the 3DConnexion 3D mouse it works BRILLIANTLY when use camera mode and I reverse everything in sight. i.e. when you push the tap the part goes further away and when you move the cap to the right, so does the part. It's almost like touching the thing.
I haven't found a sensible use for the two buttons yet. Any suggestions?
Although I now have a 3DConnexion 3D mouse (which is superb albeit darned pricey), in practice I find myself using the 2D mouse more than the 3D mouse, despite the fact that I still find the way it instantly loses vertical deeply irritating. [And yes I have also worked out how to get vertical back by rotate my parts clockwise/anticlockwise on the screen by clicking and dragging small circles with my 2D mouse!]
All I want is *some* way of doing what is apparently called "Orbit".
It's almost same thing as when mouse was introduced as a way to interact together with keyboard - for some things it's superb but some things are still better to do with just using keyboard.
I've read through the thread and I'm still struggling to understand any use case where this rotation "style" is beneficial? All the counter-arguments seem to coalesce around two flavors:
Is it really that big of an ask for a "Lock horizontal rotation" option?
I too am new to Onshape. I'm in the process of evaluation all affordable CAD programs. The UI is critical: I have no idea why, but the defacto-standard of 3D CAD programs is to make the UI as deliberately unintuitive and tedious as possible. The more expensive the cost, the less intuitive it is. The added power is a poor excuse: There's absolutely no legitimate reason a program like Onshape should be so much more difficult to work in than say, TinkerCad.
In a few hours you can be building models in TinkerCad that'll take you months to learn how to create in the likes of Onshape, Fusion360, etc.
Why is that a feature and not a bug? The only logical reason I can come up with is that it's in the financial interest of working professionals to keep the barriers to entry as high as possible. The difficulty is deliberate and reasoned: It's job protection.
This tip saved me from dumping Onshape in the trash heap. Yes, un-constrained orbiting is that much of a show stopper. Thank goodness Onshape apparently offers it, albeit unintuitively:
https://www.onshape.com/en/resource-center/tech-tips/tech-tip-rotation-with-an-upright-vertical-axis#:~:text=Rotating%20an%20object%20in%203D,right%20mouse%20button%20and%20drag.