Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

Complex Tube Routing [sweeps, multi-plane sketches, 3d sketches?]

Hi folks,

I'm working on routing some tubes with some complex paths. I plan these routes by making a path and then sweeping a tube along it. The manufacturing process imposes a fixed bend radius I need to model in. There are multiple bend planes per tube. In Solidworks, the way I would have done this would have been a 3D sketch. Because it's a 3d sketch, I can filet the sketch (sweep centerline) with the appropriate centerline bend radius, and then sweep a single profile (bonus points because I can define the sketch with external references so tube routings update as other components move).

I figured out one workflow where I make a skeleton sketch, and then add a 3-point plane for each bend I want to do, and then do an in-plane sketch for each bend which did not get modelled in a sketch plane (i.e. any place where two sketches have a coincident point) but this significantly increases the overhead.

A simple case study part -

This tube has two bend planes. I created the sweep path in two sketches. The sketches were able to be joined along a colinear feature, so it only took two sketches to get everything fileted.

This part however will require additional sketches to filet because the two sketches don't join on a co-linear feature. I have some simple tube runs with non-planar strain relief bends which could easily require dozens of sketches using this method, which I'm not excited about.

Any thoughts on a better workflow?

Answers

Sign In or Register to comment.