Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Hopes & Fears for Onshape
Dave_Gaffney
Member Posts: 2 ✭
in General
Hopes:
Onshape will become the next Solidworks (Reach critical mass & become the industry standard for CAD)
Continue improving at an impressive pace
Fears:
Onshape will become the next Solidworks (Alienate its users with unreasonable T&C's, leaving them feeling trapped)
Pricing:
I understand that cash is king, particularly for a startup trying to prove a business model.
It would be nice to know that Onshape wouldn't jack up prices in the future, it would be even nicer if Onshape were to reward its early customers with locked-in discounted future pricing (with the ability to take breaks in subscription). This kind of incentive might help Onshape reach critical mass sooner and reward its early customers at a time when it can afford to.
5
Comments
We (our founders, employees and investors) are committed to building a professional grade 3D CAD solution for engineers and designers that leverages the benefits of the new platforms (cloud web and mobile) and works the way people work today (distributed and collaborative).
We did it before at SolidWorks (becoming the industry standard) and we are working towards that same goal here at Onshape.
While i can make no promises about future pricing, our strategy should be fairly transparent - we offer FREE for makers/hobbyists/amateurs (unlimited free public documents) and for the Professional user, we have established a price point that is lower than the annual maintenance cost of comparable installed software. Raising our price above that would be giving up the distinct advantage of being 'cheaper' (in terms of monthly cost - the Onshape total cost of ownership is considerably lower than our desktop competition).
The early adopters of Onshape were rewarded handsomely with significant lifetime discounts on their accounts. As the number of professional users increases we are always open to discussions about volume discounts and as always, you can turn a Professional account on and off as needed.
Yes, we want to deliver a game-changing solution AND be the good guys once again!
Thank you for your support of Onshape.
philip_thomas said:The early adopters of Onshape were rewarded handsomely with significant lifetime discounts on their accounts. As the number of professional users increases we are always open to discussions about volume discounts and as always, you can turn a Professional account on and off as needed.
Where are these handsomely significant discounts you speak of?
For me it would be enough to give lifetime guarantee that I can always use Onshape in it's full scale with $100 / month.
And possibility to add users to same company license on same price as needed.
@philip_thomas As you know I have been quite active follower on forums since I found it. I don't like anonymous vote downs - it might even cut some good discussion since no-one want's to take blame on down voting. Like you wanted to assure it wasn't you.
Earlier I had a fan who voted all my comments down (around 50 down votes in few weeks), moderators removed those but it showed how someone can ruin the good spirit of this excellent and helpful forum.
If I wan't to give down votes, I have no problems tag my username on that vote.
+1 for tagging down votes with username, actually down votes should be called 'disagree' and up votes 'agree'.
Neither do I, but if you answer on 'how to' question and your answer is voted down - it gives expression that your answer is not good or doesn't work.
I'm sure there is a lot of people looking for answers who never write on forums..
I think the concept of downvotes is a bit silly. You don't even know why a comment is being downvoted. In general I think this forum is quite civilized; Youtube is a different beast.
Dries
www.keyshot.com
Currently in onshape's favor you have portability and better collaboration and I'm a huge fan of the improved mate connectors
Solidworks favor: many more features, more feature control, more hotkeys/shortcuts, customization, production/analysis tools, sheet metal, weldments, import feature recognition (to some extent), larger community base, more plugins, cleaner work environment (I'm looking at you feature tree and 10+ tabs that people keep crying out on), animations and renderings, simulation, better security over file permissions, 20+ year history (bigger companies WANT stable support that they know won't go bankrupt and leave them in the dark)
Granted to get high end control of items like simulation is an extra cost, but you have access to the same services that you have to pay extra for in onshape.
Other selling points are pretty low at this point. ie: "more frequent updates than the competitor" is not a selling point it's a requirement to catch up. I'll be impressed if you're releasing new features as often in 5 years let alone 20. Unfortunately even the portability may go away soon as solidworks is starting to test browser support now.
Don't get me wrong here. Onshape has amazing potential to be a real powerhouse. I follow the updates/blogs/webinars/tutorials almost religiously and even plan on promoting it locally, but at this point I would max out at paying $20/month for the current feature-set, unlimited or tiered.
I understand if this post gets deleted as it is very unflattering, but I do hope to gain some positive attention from the leads at onshape before that happens. A lot of people want to support onshape, but have already said the pricing seems unrealistic. Through the webinars it is repeated that this is a professional cad system which feels like an excuse not a justification for the current price.
I did a lot of single feature testing with free plan and decided to risk and go pro to be able to make some real work. After 6 months and big bunch of improvement requests (some of them currently implemented) it begins to feel more home than our primary cad system.
When I need to access old models in file based cad, I'm always frustrated with something being renamed or moved using file explorer. Recently I needed to create quick model with traditional cad and I found myself thinking all the time: Do I really need to create own sketch and feature for every part and why there is gazillion buttons behind all kind of tabs and menus while I only need one toolbar.
Not to even mention the hassle with updating models back to server if modified on the go..
I'm not saying Onshape is anywhere near to say SolidWorks or even Geomagic (Alibre) in feature level but they have some fundamental things light years ahead that makes them so promising that I'm not even a bit interested if SW is having browser support add-on in next years upgrades or not.
That said, it still seems hard to justify the price tag this early. The forum has a huge wish list. Some are unique situations like specific mate conditions, but there are also many items that should be standard (i.e. file sharing control to prevent misuse)
I started to write out a response to each of your points, but that easily could have gotten us off subject.
Right now, we have the protocols in place that prevents almost all of these issues, and I don't use toolbars. I wouldn't mind talking more about those through email.