Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Manipulator Style Cheat Sheet?
S1mon
Member Posts: 3,982 PRO
Does anyone have a cheat sheet for all the manipulator styles/types? There are no illustrations in the standard docs and I had to dig around to figure out that the one I was looking for is called "tangential".
See also:
Simon Gatrall | Product Development, Engineering, Design, Onshape | Ex- IDEO, PCH, Unagi, Carbon | LinkedIn
Tagged:
0
Comments
Default:
Secondary:
Simple:
Tangential:
Experts in Onshape Automation - Custom Features and Integrated Applications
@Caden_Armstrong
Thanks. That covers the styles:
But then there are also a bunch of types:
And then, can I have a secondary/triad_full?
Angular is really painful without a diagram of what the various inputs mean:
When I set up a pretty simple test feature, it took me a lot of flipping and axis choices to get to the point where I finally got the draft manipulator on this in the right orientation:
Simon Gatrall | Product Development, Engineering, Design, Onshape | Ex- IDEO, PCH, Unagi, Carbon | LinkedIn
At some point in programming you just got to try it out and see for yourself.
Its part of why featurescript is great, its really easy to whip together a quick sample just to test things out.
What about the angular documentation could be improved? To me, everything looks pretty well explained.
Experts in Onshape Automation - Custom Features and Integrated Applications
In retrospect, I guess the angular info is clear-ish. However, as I was trying to use it to drive draft, in my brain, pull direction is one of the most important "axes", and I assumed the stationary line of the manipulator was the axis. The axis is actually not a visible part of the manipulator at all. It's the axis of rotation. Again, in retrospect, I imagine that the positive z of that vector defines which way the angle winds, and the x or the y defines the stationary part. However, a simple diagram would have really made that a lot more clear.
Simon Gatrall | Product Development, Engineering, Design, Onshape | Ex- IDEO, PCH, Unagi, Carbon | LinkedIn