Part Studios just takes too long to write...

traveler_hauptman

I struggled with the Part Studio term when I first came to Onshape. It feels a bit unwieldy to me; and I'm really curious what other names they tested. 

Anyway, I just realized that abbreviating 'Part Studio' to Studio works quite well and I'll be using it from now on. Now I can confidently say "My assembly has two instances of the part from one studio and references an external studio." and not feel like it has too many parts.

I don't know if I'm the first with this, but I'm definitely adopting it wholeheartedly. 

  

caradon

Good thinking.
I agree on the concept of 'Studio'.
While I'm at it... Shouldn't 'Documents' be called 'Projects'?

Dries

billy2

I like studio better then part studio.

jon_hirschtick

@DriesVervoort_Caradon we thought a lot about the Documents/Projects thing...as Onshape continues to evolve I believe there will be more and more reasons to support "Document".  But of course I might be wrong.

caradon

Jon Hirschtick said:

@DriesVervoort_Caradon we thought a lot about the Documents/Projects thing...as Onshape continues to evolve I believe there will be more and more reasons to support "Document".  But of course I might be wrong.

Then that is what I came to realize after I posted that message.

Dries

nick_lumb

How about "folder"?

_Ðave_

I think there trying to stay away from the whole folder concept (unfortunately) starting with the term folder.