Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Feedback after a couple of days
jonne_valola791
Member Posts: 3 ✭
Have used Alias, I-deas, Pro/E, Solidworks, Rhino, Fusion 3D and now some days with Onshape. Many people can say the same, but this is just to explain that I have 15 yrs of this kind of baggage curbing my enthusiasm.
I don't see this working out very soon, because:
1) Lack of responsiveness. I'm running this on a workstation tethered to broadband. A couple of items in the assembly and its like modelling inside a tar pit. I think this comes down to relying on WebGL.
2) Lack of features. I have no doubt Onshape will get there but man it has a long way to go. And on the other hand, if it aims to be "Solidworks Lite", its going to be just another niche product.
On the positive side, the UI is very good.
I'm going to join the wait-and-see pool. But I really,really hope for success for Onshape.
Perhaps a properly accelerated local client would change the prognosis? Some features I can live without but lack of responsiveness... I don't know. Its a killer for anyone who does more than an occasional bit of 3D modelling.
Thanks for the obvious and redundant feedback? You're welcome. I'll just slither back under the rock now.
I don't see this working out very soon, because:
1) Lack of responsiveness. I'm running this on a workstation tethered to broadband. A couple of items in the assembly and its like modelling inside a tar pit. I think this comes down to relying on WebGL.
2) Lack of features. I have no doubt Onshape will get there but man it has a long way to go. And on the other hand, if it aims to be "Solidworks Lite", its going to be just another niche product.
On the positive side, the UI is very good.
I'm going to join the wait-and-see pool. But I really,really hope for success for Onshape.
Perhaps a properly accelerated local client would change the prognosis? Some features I can live without but lack of responsiveness... I don't know. Its a killer for anyone who does more than an occasional bit of 3D modelling.
Thanks for the obvious and redundant feedback? You're welcome. I'll just slither back under the rock now.
1
Comments
I have an apology to make: indeed, there seems to be some sort of funky going on with the workstation graphics card driver. I am now running Onshape from a home computer with a bog standard GeForce and its much better. I'm going to check out the details of the graphics card in the workstation and will put in a note via the feedback tool. EDIT: the workstation in question runs SW and Pro/E with no issues, so I think its got to do with WebGL.
With regards to features you need, I would recommend using the Feedback tool in the product and giving that experience a try - there is really nothing like it in the CAD industry. Of course you can mention them right here, too.