Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Crowd-driven design
matt_hardman
Member Posts: 24 ✭✭
in General
You start the design of a product and mark it as public, or share it in some way.
Anyone is able to modify the product, but since it's fully versioned, eventually we can home in on the best design.
This is crowd-driven design, the OS way (I think). The crowd can be limited to just your organisation, just those with editor privileges as set by you, or open to everybody.
In my organisation we use a design review process to critique design. It works well for the most part I suppose. With a couple of notable exceptions: design review notes are not kept with the 3D model, other people can't show you what they mean by simply editing your model, and CAD software is a bit clunky when it comes to presenting. We also use Project Data Management (PDM) software, so sharing designs like this aught to be easy, except it's not. OS uses branching to allow us to explore different ideas. This is so much better than anything i've used before.
So what happens if we want to compare those competing designs? They might be different branches in the same Part Studio, or they might have started life in totally different workspaces.
What else would make the experience of design collaboration easier?
Anyone is able to modify the product, but since it's fully versioned, eventually we can home in on the best design.
This is crowd-driven design, the OS way (I think). The crowd can be limited to just your organisation, just those with editor privileges as set by you, or open to everybody.
In my organisation we use a design review process to critique design. It works well for the most part I suppose. With a couple of notable exceptions: design review notes are not kept with the 3D model, other people can't show you what they mean by simply editing your model, and CAD software is a bit clunky when it comes to presenting. We also use Project Data Management (PDM) software, so sharing designs like this aught to be easy, except it's not. OS uses branching to allow us to explore different ideas. This is so much better than anything i've used before.
So what happens if we want to compare those competing designs? They might be different branches in the same Part Studio, or they might have started life in totally different workspaces.
What else would make the experience of design collaboration easier?
Tagged:
1
Comments
1. You ensure that everyone you send the slide to sees the information (or at least has to scroll past the slide)
2. You ensure that everyone get's the same view (cross-section, or with parts hidden, etc), or even just the orientation how you want them to see it
3. You don't have to send the entire dataset, just an image.
But what if there was a way to present your ideas and comments in a way that could also be used to present on screen to a group. Like a slide show that would transition the model between different scenes, with different comments and supporting images?
Once you start 3D design an idea seems to more quickly become set in stone. Does anyone else find this? It might be because you've invested time and effort into generating that idea in CAD. I wonder if there's a digital alternative to this intial-ideas process. What do other people do?
LearnOnshape facebook group