Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Best modelling workflow for multi-part
Josy_La
Member Posts: 82 ✭✭
I am custom to Inventor and SolidWorks, both software are use differently to obtain an ideal workflow for multi part assemblies. Of course there are other ways to use these platforms. Outside Featurescript what would be the best workflow in OS to create adaptable static models?
We are presently using a skeletal modelling technique to create our multi-parts assemblies. But I've also worked with a different approach using a wire and generic parts library that can be stretch and applied onto that wire to generate the multi-part assembly. In my OS investigation the skeletal method seems to work fine but did not have success with the other approach.
If your manufacturing process is similar and you do not utilize FS how do you use OS?
Thanks for sharing.
We are presently using a skeletal modelling technique to create our multi-parts assemblies. But I've also worked with a different approach using a wire and generic parts library that can be stretch and applied onto that wire to generate the multi-part assembly. In my OS investigation the skeletal method seems to work fine but did not have success with the other approach.
If your manufacturing process is similar and you do not utilize FS how do you use OS?
Thanks for sharing.
0
Best Answer
-
3dcad Member, OS Professional, Mentor Posts: 2,475 PROEverything that is static (ie. no motion, they can be parametric) can be easily modeled into single part studio. Parts with motion I tend to have as subassembly so I can set limits etc. only once and just insert to any assy. When inserting whole part studio into assembly all static parts can be mated with one group mate which is a real time saver comparing to 3 mates per part system (Alibre).
//rami7
Answers
Onshape, Inc.