Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Rectangle Tool - what construction geometry should Onshape provide?
andrew_troup
Member, Mentor Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭✭✭
I was disappointed "back in the day" when Solidworks chose to add diagonal construction lines as an option. Of the three possibilities I can think of, it's the least useful.
One of the other two possibilities has recently been added to Sldwks (about a decade late, to my way of thinking): a full width construction line in conjunction with a full height one.
I would personally prefer (in most cases) a half-height line meeting a half-width one at the geometrical centre of the rectangle. I don't think I would ever have a use for the diagonal style.
The same options should be available for round-cornered rectangles when they put in an appearance (nudge, nudge !) and obround slots. I reckon.
One of the other two possibilities has recently been added to Sldwks (about a decade late, to my way of thinking): a full width construction line in conjunction with a full height one.
I would personally prefer (in most cases) a half-height line meeting a half-width one at the geometrical centre of the rectangle. I don't think I would ever have a use for the diagonal style.
The same options should be available for round-cornered rectangles when they put in an appearance (nudge, nudge !) and obround slots. I reckon.
0
Comments
I understand that the center of a rectangle isn't a point that you clicked (unlike the circle) but the center of a line is also implicit.