Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

How can I figure out what is wrong with a CAM Studio Tool Path?

dean_mulladean_mulla Member Posts: 11 EDU
edited November 25 in CAM Studio

We are just starting to use CAM Studio for our FRC team. However, I have not been able to get any tool path to successfully generate. I have tried a hole tool path and an edge tool path.

Are there any tips for determining what is preventing the tool path from generating successfully?

Tagged:

Answers

  • edward_petrilloedward_petrillo Member Posts: 96 EDU

    Here is an example of toolpaths for a siimple part: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/1e975a485f02973c263a1b87/w/92fe1470335100cdaa2510aa/e/538c7d752cc5ee7f2c8834d1

    Documentation for CAM Studio is very limited. I was able to create these toolpaths largely by trial and error. I found much of the terminology used to be unfamiliar despite my previous experience with several other entry-level CAM programs. We CNC parts that are mostly similar to the example using VCarve Pro. It's not yet apparant that CAM Studio would be a suitable alternative..

  • GWS50GWS50 Member Posts: 490 PRO
    edited November 15

    Yes I'm afraid I agree with this, The terminology does seem a little alien. I too am used the CAM software like VCarve Pro and other Vectric programs which make short work of setting up toolpaths. When using a router, I can't seem to find a way of setting the world origin to near left corner without having to add an off-set of half the table width/length. Still I'm sure things will get ironed out with time.

    Some more documentation would be helpful. Some of the inputs don't have the helpful 'question mark' next to them, even this would be helpful.

  • dean_mulladean_mulla Member Posts: 11 EDU

    So I cannot open Edward's example. Here is the CAM studio for the gusset I'm trying to get to generate a tool path. I think I'm stuck on the tool path portion - I think I have the tool set up ok and the machine set up ok but I might not.

    From a complexity point of view this seems much closer to Fusion 360 than it does to Vectric's Cut2D which we have been using for our CNC router with great success.

    This is my attempt at CAM studio (if anyone wants to look at it and provide suggestions):

    https://cad.onshape.com/documents/deadad918a55315c17a5724c/w/30917aee17950d1fcaf5f263/e/0ef89ce6bc1ebcf50e315747

  • dean_mulladean_mulla Member Posts: 11 EDU

    I did something but I don't know exactly what and got the profile (outer) to generate. However I'm now unable to get the pockets (I could do them as holes also but that doesn't work either) to generate…

    Same CAM studio as the URL above.

  • edward_petrilloedward_petrillo Member Posts: 96 EDU

    Apparently Holes can only be created with a Drilling toolpath. To cut them with your 4mm endmill. use a two-axis profile. Select the edges on the bottom of the holes and ensure that the "cutting side" under the "Sorting" dropdown is set to "Right"

  • dean_mulladean_mulla Member Posts: 11 EDU

    So with Pattern=Drilling" and Type="Holes" there isn't any "Sorting" dropdown that I see anywhere to select "Right".

    However, using those selections (Type=Holes,Pattern=Drilling) and also selecting the Holes/"Selection filter"="Hole" then selecting all the through holes made it possible to have a tool path when I regenerated the toolpath and the stock.

    So somehow this has made it so I have both a hole toolpath and a profile toolpath.

    I still have to figure out how to do a pocket toolpath but this is a lot of progress.

    Thanks!

  • edward_petrilloedward_petrillo Member Posts: 96 EDU

    My understanding is the the Holes pattern assumes that you are using a drill bit whose diameter corresponds to the desired diameter of the hole. If so, the drilling toolpath you created will yield a 4mm hole rather that the 5.4mm hole (?) that is your target. This result should be apparent if you verify the toolpath.

    Change the pattern to "Two axis Profile" -it appears I did not make that clear- and then proceed as described in my earlier post.

    Your problem points to needed improvements in CAM Studio. The program should verify that the drill you are using corresponds to the size of the hole you select. The absence of the "measure" tool that OS provides in Parts Studios and assemblies means you have to remember the hole size, or any other dimension that is pertinent to your job.

  • Dr_BDr_B Member Posts: 2 EDU

    I am really trying to get Onshape CAM to work for our team (2530) this year. There are quite a few hurdles in terms of both learning and a few functional gaps, but I think doable. One things I can't figure our is why when I'm doing something like a 2D rough to get a bearing hole it doesn't just do a spiral from the center (it steps over and then makes a circle)

    Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 4.24.31 PM.png

    and between each depth it retracts back to the clearance distance. I can make it stop going all the way back out by changing some of the "small links between passes" parameters to 'direct' or 'spline' but then it doesn't properly spiral in to the next layer—it just plows through to the center as a move/ramp. I'm sure this is something simple I'm missing…. The 'retract to feed distance' still goes up the clearance and slowly spirals back down.

    Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 4.19.40 PM.png

    vs. 'Direct' or 'spline' where I'm sure to break a bit…

    Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 4.27.05 PM.png
  • Dr_BDr_B Member Posts: 2 EDU
    edited November 19

    Ok I think I figured out the second part.

    Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 5.07.20 PM.png

    Mets select 'retract to rapid distance' in the small links between passes…. This looks like it will work.

    Screenshot 2025-11-19 at 5.07.31 PM.png

    Nope. Actually that did look like better paths but is still retracting all of the way back up for each step down…. Argh.

Sign In or Register to comment.