Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

When Will Better CADCAM Systems Be Able To Do This?

jon_30jon_30 Member Posts: 38 ✭✭
edited December 2015 in General

Multiple stock, multiple setup is what often happens in the real world. I'm sick and tried or lame excuses from CADCAM companies on why their solid cut machine simulation can't mimic what happens in the real world:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xf3p6z_vericut-multiple-stock-multiple-set_tech


Jon Banquer

CADCAM Technology Leaders group on LinkedIn
Approx 3,400 members. Best CADCAM group on the planet




Comments

  • juan_avilesjuan_aviles Member Posts: 78 ✭✭
    I guess I don't quite understand your comment.  I machine like this now and both my CAM packages can do any type of fixture or stock configuration.
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • 3dcad3dcad Member, OS Professional, Mentor Posts: 2,475 PRO
    All that people can write is their opinion. That's what I did, wrote my opinion: I don't need such feature in CAM.
    Then I wrote reason why I don't need it. I didn't miss the point.

    One thing I agree with you, is that CAMs could be a lot better than what they are today..
    //rami
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • _Ðave__Ðave_ Member, Developers Posts: 712 ✭✭✭✭
    Sounds like your barking up the wrong tree, Onshape is a cad system and I don't believe that they have any intention of developing an integrated cam system let alone having the machine simulation capabilities on vericut.
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • _Ðave__Ðave_ Member, Developers Posts: 712 ✭✭✭✭
    Maybe you should look into something like TopSolid, But you best not expect to get it cheap
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • _Ðave__Ðave_ Member, Developers Posts: 712 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2015
    It's quite impressive, Well there you go. I think you must all ready have your solution. But I do think that people developing Onshape know exactly what you are referring to. I also believe that they have there hands full just developing the cad and have no intention of fully developing a cam system, which is what they would have to do for if to be fully integrated and work anywhere as well as Topsolid.
  • This content has been removed.
  • michał_1michał_1 Member, Developers Posts: 214 ✭✭✭
    Lousy car and a lousy boat, the Amphibious of CADCAM, Fusion 360:

  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • michał_1michał_1 Member, Developers Posts: 214 ✭✭✭
     "solid cut part simulation" vs "solid cut machine simulation" do you mean that fusion don't show the machine itself?
    My example show multiple setup, of course it's not multiple stock per setup, but in the end you can have single file for machining.
  • edited December 2015
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.