Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
New Onshape Logo
mike_hölscher
Member Posts: 109 PRO
Please vote-up if you fell off your chair too when you saw the new logo
EDIT2: This used to be an improvement request with a relatively high amount of votes. But it was moved to general, so no more voting.
EDIT: Found some discussions here:
https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/15088/thoughts-on-the-logo
https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/14840/onshape-we-are-here-for-you
EDIT2: This used to be an improvement request with a relatively high amount of votes. But it was moved to general, so no more voting.
EDIT: Found some discussions here:
https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/15088/thoughts-on-the-logo
https://forum.onshape.com/discussion/14840/onshape-we-are-here-for-you
Tagged:
50
Comments
Just take a look at this old badge and compare it to the new one:
From simple, effective, friendly, open (this describes Onshape as we know it), to:
Sharp, closed, over-detailled, aggressive.... (is this how it will be with PTC? I sure hope not...)
Come on guys. You are really underestimating the effect of this logo/style transition. Just keep the brand identity and put -by PTC- at the bottom of it. Like Facebook does with its big acquisitions. Its easier and keeps everybody happy.
EDIT: It seems not everybody in Onshape is using the new logo? Just got an email from Onshape with exactly this in the signature:
This would be great! Just what I was explaining.
How do people inside Onshape feel about this? They invested their lives into creating this brand-identity, not only the logo, but also the way they support their clients. It really felt different then any other CAD/company I have ever had contact with. For me it was already a bit hard to get a 'local' support contact, instead of talking to someone actually IN the OnShape building. To have an actual Onshape software engineer in a meeting helping you solve your issue by pushing a global Onshape update. This was the moment I knew Onshape was special. The logo and complete graphical style supported this feeling. Now, it does not anymore. A new logo is fine, but this new logo and style does not fit how I know Onshape, and how I would like it to be.
I'd love to hear the reasoning as to why they made this change, or at least why they made just a half-arsed effort of it. In the meantime, I (and seemingly everyone else) would prefer either a total rebrand or to have the old logo put back. I can't imagine they keep the logo anyway judging from the critical reception.
And its stretched.
And I did not know Professional was spelled that way.
Yeah, but at least the half-assed re-branding attempt is a clear warning to new customers to look elsewhere before they get locked in.
They’re probably far more concerned about what kind of sandwich they’re going to be having for lunch
Capocollo & Genoa with Provolone sounds good to me
Is this intended to be a conversation stopper? The new Onshape house style mess is of more interest to me than your coronary.
Has the shape and color of that logo honestly affected your ability to use the app
Do you think there are any users that would shy away from the app because of the logo.
I was involved in construction management for builders and aerospace. I had to hire engineers to do work for me. These were people doing serious work.
For the life of me, I couldn’t imagine them shying away from an app, because of the shape or color of the logo — knowing full well that using that app would give them an advantage or save them time, and headaches
Was it working ?
A little while before onshape was sold, was it working for the investors at that point ?
Personally I have no idea.
You know without investors, a lot of things like this would never of gotten off the ground. So I surely wouldn’t want to start treating investors like chopped liver
But if the investors or those that were running onshape, thought it was best that the company sell to PTC, who was I to tell them no.
So PTC buys Onshape. PTC with revenue of 1.5 billion a year. Seems that someone at the company knows at least a little bit about running a big Corp.
And now PTC has the gall to want to give their acquisition a logo more in keeping with their other products. How dare they (joke joke)
Maybe there are some branding experts that have been participating in this discussion. Maybe they have worked IN NO SMALL WAY with billion dollar companies to design their logos and letter heads, signage, and web stuff. Well I’m here to tell you that I’m certainly not one of those design experts
I did get a little bit of laugh when reading about how bad green was supposed to be for a logo, because I googled green logos and saw a ton of major companies that used green logos, and also read what green is supposed to stand for
I could agree about the comment on the contrast of button colors because contrast is something that an older guy like myself is concerned about. But the buttons don’t necessarily have to be green. There is another color in that logo and they certainly could use that for buttons
But beyond who is the expert on branding stuff, and beyond who knows what’s best for PTC, well I’m a big believer in letting people run their company the way they want.
Let’s assume there are people participating in these discussions, who own a company(s) or have part ownership. I wonder how many of them would feel the same way about others coming in there and telling them to forget the logo you want — design it the way I tell you to or leave it as is. Now I’m sure nobody minds some advice or friendly comments about what is prefered
But please excuse me if I find it hard to buy into the statement that they’re WRECKING IT because of the new branding, as I don’t see any numbers to support that
And there’s a lot of people here in the forums that want the best for onshape. I’ve tried to do my part with my little GIFs in hopes of helping others to learn and hence, make the program more successful.
Regarding corporate acquisitions —Personally I believe PTC is very much into SAS. SAS gives that steady income that corporations are looking for. And I think onshape makes up a big component of that SAS, at least in the future.
Myself – I don’t see Onshape going anywhere. A lot of what Onhape is, is about the fact that it was built to work from the ground up, over the Internet.
Now from what I’ve read, you CANNOT take an existing off line CAD package and try to tweek it to work exclusively over the Internet, and have it turn out as successful and work in the same fluid way that onshape does. I believe AutoDesk has attempted it and they couldn’t get it to work. So onshape is a unique product of which I don’t see it going away.
If anything, I would see PTC incorporating parts of other programs such as CREO or whatever their other top of the line CAD package is into Onshape.
So I see them very possibly retaining Onshape as the CORE component or technology, and adding onto it
Now is it going to become a new program if they do that? I don’t know? but I don’t see a Onshape or the guts of Onshape going away
By the way I don’t have any kind of insider information that’s for sure. I’ve never even met anyone from Onshape. And I’ve never spoken with anyone over the phone from Onshape. So this is all my speculation
My two bits
And as with a company like autodesk, they realize that acquisitions are important to maintaining some kind of an edge.
Numerous other companies that are not diversifying — that are concentrating more on a limited product line or maybe one product only, well a number of these companies are slowly becoming more irrelevant or fading away
Bigger companies like Amazon, Walmart, and Alibaba realize that trying to stay in one place and maintain equilibrium, will not work for them. It’s either grow, or little by little start to fall behind and become less and less relevant
With the above in mind, PTC has been about growing, diversifying, moving into different products for years
As such, I’m not worried about the survival of PTC
As far as community goes. as I said earlier, I try and contribute in the way I can. I’ve posted a fair amount of GIFs — hopefully some will be helped at least a little by them
You already said you’re not gonna turn away from the program because of that logo. SO THEY DON’T HAVE TO SELL ANYTHING TO YOU. YOU’RE A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE ALREADY. And like me, a non-paying one at that, so ...
The point I made earlier was, you never gave me any numbers on how they WRECKED the company or app or whatever
You have no idea how their sales are going. I’m guessing they probably have a long-term plan regardless of whatever the rate of growth is at this current time — for what that’s worth
But until you can show me how people are turning away from the app because of the logo — with some good hard numbers — and not fall back on the argument that a handful of people say they’re not crazy about the logo, well until then, maybe it would be expedient to use some other word than WRECKING
I haven’t heard of one person turning away from the program because of the new logo. And I doubt any serious people doing any kind of serious work would turn away from the program because of a logo
There are a ton of products that I buy that have logos that aren’t very attractive. Sure doesn’t stop me from buying and using whatever it is that those logos are stamped on. And I bet the same goes for EVERYBODY else here
Everybody’s going to go ahead and talk about what they would prefer or why they believe something else would be better. No big thing about that. Very understandable. And I absolutely am not here trying to insert myself as an arbiter on what can and can’t be said about the logo
MY ONLY HOPE IS THAT YOU WOULD AT LEAST CONSIDER TEMPERING YOUR LANGUAGE A TINY BIT BECAUSE I REALLY DON’T BELIEVE USING A WORD LIKE WRECKING, IS HELPFUL, WHEN YOU DON’T HAVE ANYTHING TO BACK UP WHAT YOU SAY
As to your COMMUNITY stuff. The community is working. People are helping one another. They’re writing FeatureScript for others to use. I’m sure they’re trying to tell others about the program when they get the chance. There’s a lot of interaction within the community. The community is working. But no doubt — you’re going to try and convince me that this logo is absolutely and unequivocably destroying the community and maybe messing with their psyche and who knows what else. Save your breath. I DON’T BUY IT ONE BIT. The forum is going to go on. Everything else is going to go on THE SAME WAY IT HAS BEFORE
History has shown that it’s a stable company. Myself, I believe onshape is here for the long run because it is SaaS based. My opinion
But I’m not gonna convince you
And you’re not gonna convince me
No amount of discussion on this one is going to change either of our minds
so I’m out of here on this one
Have a good one !
Green. blue, hexagons, circles...not sure that it's that important to my job!