Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
FEATURE REQUESTS
3dcad
Member, OS Professional, Mentor Posts: 2,475 PRO
Do you have feature request, please write it here
3 categories:
1. I need these features in order to get OnShape in production use and if these will be there it will be worth $100/month for me.
2. I would like to see these features in OS someday in near future
3. I would like to see these features in mobile apps
@LouGallo Can you make this stick on top or create a similar one?
3 categories:
1. I need these features in order to get OnShape in production use and if these will be there it will be worth $100/month for me.
2. I would like to see these features in OS someday in near future
3. I would like to see these features in mobile apps
@LouGallo Can you make this stick on top or create a similar one?
//rami
Tagged:
2
Comments
2) I'm not sure how this would be possible, but some sort of offline support would be a nice thing to have for times when I am without a good connection (which happens frequently on work trips - and obviously in airports and on planes.).
3) Offline viewing would be a nice feature in the mobile apps. This would be a great benefit to show models to people when in poor reception areas (tradeshow events come to mind)
Category 1.
Category 2.
- On-the-fly dimensioning for rectangle, circle and line
- My own common-part library with rules for auto-constraining into assembly
- Millions of other things
Category 3.- Perfect measurement tool to quickly show measures from model
- A lot of automation which could be managed in settings (pc and mobile)
- Measure-tapes and human/cola can/matchbox/coin -figure to show rough scale when representing models
- Read-only offline view (+1 for what @Mark suggested)
A lot of further testing is needed to have a complete list for my needs. I'm designing mainly flat-pack furniture for my own factory production and secondary everything from small machine spareparts to complete factory layout with buildings and machines. In a nutshell, I use 3d cad for everything that needs to be drawn."I don't do windows"
Lofting along variable irregular profiles in order to get free/organic surfaces... that's the tool I use on a daily basis, and the one tool I didn't find on my first attempt!
Text is another feature, font selection, size, etc.
Ability to write own macro driven features should add another boost.
fi free up a corner for lasercuting, slots, ...
Parametric dimensioning
Greetz,
XiaoShiZi
Ariel, WA
- While in Onshape, Click ? menu in the upper right and select Feedback (markup/comment/submit) PRO TIP: CTRL U will launch it too.
- From Onshape, Click on your Name (Upper right) -> View support tickets -> Submit a request (upper middle)
Either of those will work to send in your thoughts. We then match them up to our internal bug/improvement tracker with all the details, scope, UI etc so we can then schedule and deliver them to you. We do extract tickets from the forums but it doesn't work for laundry lists of features that are requested in one comment.I am going to be building a way for you to put in requests and show them in a list to vote on here as soon as I can. While we are in Beta, the feedback tool allows us to prioritize improvements for the future. Thank you for your input.
I greatly appreciate OnS going to the trouble of converting my forum posts to request tickets, as you have been.
I will amend my procedure to free up OnS staff so they can spend their time more directly on making more magic happen.
I think the team are off to a superb start. It seems to me there are three main ways we can contribute usefully:
1) Alerting them to features, workflows, or concepts missing in the state of the art packages, which would make a big diff to us
2) Pointing out features etc. poorly implemented in OnS and/or the competititors
3) Pointing out features etc. well implemented ditto.
and saying why (and giving a context around that)
I think we can safely assume OnS realise a great many features are missing at present, but I for one would rather they attack them in the order which best supports an awesome product in a year's time, and (even more importantly ten years' time, rather than rushing to implement quickly just to placate the most vocal contingent from the public beta program.
I personally think there's little chance of OnS stumbling into the latter trap, but it seems to me it can't hurt for the rest of us to think more strategically about this phase.
A paradigm shift is not a recruitment campaign, and it's easy to miss the big strategic target in the distance when the focus goes on picking off small tactical targets in the foreground. I think short-term-ism of this type is the single most serious vice of modern US business practice.
Hi Andrew, I absolutely agree with all of your comments and as far as I can tell Onshape will indeed bring about a paradigm shift.
I would also add that short-term-ism, isn't just a huge problem for the US, but for the majority of Westernised business.
I am a ui and ux designer. From the website introducing you to the service to the workflow itself the User Experience is fantastic! I come from experience from various platforms including autodesk inventor. I have by reflex hit CTRL S multiple times while using this amazing platform I've been waiting for for years. Eventually all software will do away with manual saving but until then its a good habit I don't want to get out of just yet. I suggest override CTRL S that currently offers to save the website as a html. Reassign it to a notification area used for other notifications and put incouraging remarks like
keep it up,
good work,
are you a genius?
etc.
What I would need to make it worth paying the monthly subscription are as follows:
-Sheet metal flat development and *.dxf export
-Lofting
-Surfacing tools
-2D drawings with BOM
-Built in rendering, something similar to Keyshot?
I really think Onshape is starting off in the direction others will only follow(cloud collaboration). Please keep us updated of new features etc. or have a "what's new" section on the home page.
The guys tinkering with 3D printers will love this stuff. Great for creating content to be 3D printed I'm sure.
Anyway, just my thoughts and humble opinion...
2.
3.
- A way to tag the documents to make finding a category of document easier.
- A way to create personal document collections and a way to save public documents to these collections. Similar to Thingiverse or Instructables.
- A way to add public comments to documents.
- auto creation of standard bolts and nuts by just inputing the required measurements.
- auto creation of gear by inputing the required measurements like pitch, diameter & etc.
those features will save a lots of time
I tried OS for a while and it feels promising but there are many essential features still missing before it is useful for commercial use for me.
Lofting both surface and solid would make a big difference and be able to make sheet metal parts is a must.
Boundary surface is the most versatile surfacing tool in Solidworks and a similar surfacing tool would be great.
Also inbuilt rendering and FEA would be nice.
Pricing of 100$/month feels too much with current set of tools compared to fusion 360 with better modeling and rendering tools for 40$/month or 300$/ year.
Free use for learning, evaluation and hobbyist use is good and is a good way to get new users intrested in you product.
Sort of like a Kickstarter investment ... if enough people were to do it, it might help keep the financial buckeroos at OnS from unduly pressuring the code jockeys to release stuff which still needs work.
I guess OnS would have to provide some sort of mechanism to make such advance payments possible.