Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.

First time visiting? Here are some places to start:
  1. Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
  2. Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
  3. Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
  4. Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.

If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.

Grouping Enum

Dylan_StewartDylan_Stewart Member, Developers Posts: 107 PRO
Okay so it's been a little while since I've deep in to FS and I have another hurdle to jump. 

I am trying to group my enums instead of having a huge list. 

I have a lot of different sketch profiles that will always be together when imported in. I have to separate them due to the complexity of the profile so each part will extrude correctly. 


annotation {"Feature Type Name": "Group Enum"}
export const myGroupEnum = defineFeature(function(context is Context, id is Id, definition is map)
precondition
{
annotation {"Name":"Profile1"}
definition.profile_1 is 1profile;

annotation {"Name":"Profile2"}
definition.profile_2 is 2profile;

annotation {"Name":"Profile3"}
definition.profile_3 is 3profile;
}PROFILES::import(importedDoc/123456.....)

export enum 1profile
{
   annotation {"Name":"1"}
   123_0
}
<pre class="CodeBlock"><code>export enum 2profile
{
   annotation {"Name":"2"}
   456_0
}
<pre class="CodeBlock"><code>export enum 3profile
{
   annotation {"Name":"3"}
   789_0
}
This example only uses 3 profiles but I imagine I will have somewhere in the neighborhood of around 20-30...
Is there a way to 'bypass' the need for this in the precondition?

What would be better is to be able to group all of the profiles that will be used in to 1 enumerator.

As always, your help is greatly appreciated.  
Digital Engineering

Best Answer

  • mahirmahir Member, Developers Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Answer ✓
    @Dylan_Stewart, I'm not sure what the desired end result is, but I don't see why you can't just code the desired behavior into a branched if/else based on an initial selection.

    If (definition.profile =="123")
    ...import profiles 1, 2, 3
    else if (definition.profile == "456")
    ...import profiles 4, 5, 6
    else if (definition.profile == "789")
    ...import profiles 7, 8, 9

    Another option is to group your profiles into an array of sub arrays that separates and organizes all the various profiles.

    var profiles as array = [ [1a, 1b, 1c, 1d], [2a, 2b], [3a, 3b, 3c] ]

    Then, depending on which enum is selected, you can load all the profiles in either profiles[1], profiles[2], or profiles,[3].

Answers

  • kevin_o_toole_1kevin_o_toole_1 Onshape Employees, Developers, HDM Posts: 565
    edited October 2016
    It sounds like you want a single enum defined with several options. With n profiles, you'll need n imports into n namespaces, but only one parameter and one list of options. Here' an example:
    
    FeatureScript 422;
    import(path : "onshape/std/geometry.fs", version : "422.0");
    
    // Created using import button above
    PROFILE_1::import(path : "b43fcf52027e641d12c6e75b", version : "b9ff861b36c4801a846c3058");
    PROFILE_2::import(path : "fad6bab7c868aa7808a486c2", version : "545623d9717aa6a186745075");
    PROFILE_3::import(path : "e81df29897b702fb3c66444f", version : "b889912552d569e0c391aa74");
    
    
    export enum Profiles
    {
        annotation {"Name":"1"}
        p123_0,
        annotation {"Name":"2"}
        p456_0,
        annotation {"Name":"3"}
        p789_0
        // etc.
    }
    
    annotation {"Feature Type Name": "Profile chooser"}
    export const profileChooser = defineFeature(function(context is Context, id is Id, definition is map)
    precondition
    {
        annotation {"Name" : "Profile"}
        definition.profile is Profiles;
        
        annotation { "Name" : "Size" }
        isLength(definition.size, LENGTH_BOUNDS);    
    }
    {
        println("Profile chosen is " ~ definition.profile);
        
        var profileContext;
        
        if (definition.profile == Profiles.p123_0)
            profileContext = PROFILE_1::build();
        if (definition.profile == Profiles.p456_0)
            profileContext = PROFILE_2::build();
        if (definition.profile == Profiles.p789_0)
            profileContext = PROFILE_3::build();
        // etc.
    
        // Delete construction planes and lines, leaving just a sketch region
        const profileRegion is Query = qConstructionFilter(
            qEverything(EntityType.FACE),
            ConstructionObject.NO
        );
        const profileBody is Query = qOwnerBody(profileRegion);
        opDeleteBodies(profileContext, id + "deleteBodies1", {
                "entities" : qSubtraction(qEverything(EntityType.BODY), profileBody)
        });
    
        opMergeContexts(context, id + "mergeContexts1", {
                "contextFrom" : profileContext
        });
    
        opTransform(context, id + "transform1", {
                "bodies" : qCreatedBy(id + "mergeContexts1", EntityType.BODY),
                "transform" : scaleUniformly(definition.size / (1 * inch))
        });
    
        opExtrude(context, id + "extrude1", {
                "entities" : qCreatedBy(id + "mergeContexts1", EntityType.FACE),
                "direction" : vector(0, 0, 1),
                "endBound" : BoundingType.BLIND,
                "endDepth" : 0.125 * inch
        });
    });
    
    And here's a document using this code: https://cad.onshape.com/documents/d7defad80f5b58678d7702f7/w/629ed705a4e5996689b1d2b9/e/335044dc6622d08bb86f8e9a


    Let us know if you have more questions!
  • Dylan_StewartDylan_Stewart Member, Developers Posts: 107 PRO
    Yes, that would allow you to make a choice between all of the imported profiles, but I need something that will build all of the profiles without having a huge list of 20 or so options.

    Grouping all profiles would be ideal, as there may be some options later on down the line and that's when I would like to introduce the idea of the drop-down menu. 

    Basically, I need to build a group of profiles automatically while only using 1 option from the menu. 
    Digital Engineering
  • mahirmahir Member, Developers Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Answer ✓
    @Dylan_Stewart, I'm not sure what the desired end result is, but I don't see why you can't just code the desired behavior into a branched if/else based on an initial selection.

    If (definition.profile =="123")
    ...import profiles 1, 2, 3
    else if (definition.profile == "456")
    ...import profiles 4, 5, 6
    else if (definition.profile == "789")
    ...import profiles 7, 8, 9

    Another option is to group your profiles into an array of sub arrays that separates and organizes all the various profiles.

    var profiles as array = [ [1a, 1b, 1c, 1d], [2a, 2b], [3a, 3b, 3c] ]

    Then, depending on which enum is selected, you can load all the profiles in either profiles[1], profiles[2], or profiles,[3].
  • Dylan_StewartDylan_Stewart Member, Developers Posts: 107 PRO
    @mahir

    I believe this is going to be my solution. Thank you!!
    Digital Engineering
  • mahirmahir Member, Developers Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No problem :smile:

  • lemon1324lemon1324 Member, Developers Posts: 225 EDU
    The other option may be to use a lookup table, as the Onshape hole feature does, but I'm not sure if you can use that to set non-numeric values.
    Arul Suresh
    PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University
  • kevin_o_toole_1kevin_o_toole_1 Onshape Employees, Developers, HDM Posts: 565
    @lemon1324
    You can use a lookup table to look up any FeatureScript value, not just numbers. You could even have that value be a FeatureScript map with many values inside.
Sign In or Register to comment.