Welcome to the Onshape forum! Ask questions and join in the discussions about everything Onshape.
First time visiting? Here are some places to start:- Looking for a certain topic? Check out the categories filter or use Search (upper right).
- Need support? Ask a question to our Community Support category.
- Please submit support tickets for bugs but you can request improvements in the Product Feedback category.
- Be respectful, on topic and if you see a problem, Flag it.
If you would like to contact our Community Manager personally, feel free to send a private message or an email.
Introducing the New Onshape Learning Center
Hello everyone, I’m pleased to announce the launch of our new learning portal – the Onshape Learning Center – the quickest and most efficient way of transitioning to full-cloud CAD.
This portal is made up of self-paced courses with videos, practice exercises, and self-check quizzes. The content is geared directly towards those coming from a parametric 3D CAD background and who want to learn how to maximize their use of Onshape as quickly as possible. It assumes a strong knowledge of traditional CAD concepts so that we can focus on what is unique about Onshape and how to best use it.
The Learning Center’s premium content is included with all annual subscriptions to Onshape Professional. Free Onshape account users can access our Quick Start Guide. As with all Onshape updates, both Free and Professional users will continue to see improvements and new content. For a deeper look at the offerings and benefits of our new Learning Center, please see today’s blog post.
We’re excited to bring you this new, flexible method of learning, but it’s just the beginning. Please continue to voice your needs, feedback, criticisms and thanks as we build upon this new learning platform.
If you are already an annual Professional customer, you can go to your training dashboard where your courses are waiting and ready. If you’re enjoying a Free Onshape account, please visit the Learning Center to see our free offerings or contact us to upgrade to Onshape Professional.
All the best,
-Noa Flaherty
Onshape Customer Success
Comments
Brian
Great job Noa and the rest of Onshape,
Chris Winters
If you're an annual professional customer and your training dashboard is empty, please contact us – this shouldn't be the case.
[EDIT 1] I also notice that I have "Developers" against my name, a mistake surely? [EDIT 2] That has now disappeared but so has "Member". Is there some confusion over my status and is this why I can's access the training material?
I like the way how this learning course wraps all together, I'm almost finished but I have to admit I didn't have time to proceed with the example data. I'd hope more quiz to refresh advanced users.
@wiley that is correct.
Linked[in]
I see that the Learning Center took previously publicly available content and put it behind the Pro firewall. I am starting to set up my college class for the fall and had a link to the Onshape Essentials content. When I click on the link now I get sent to the new "new" Learning Center and the content states that it is a Learning Pathway. When I click on it there is a statement that says "This Learning Pathway is included as part of your annual subscription" but I don't see how I can actually access it. Will my students who have Education accounts no longer be able to access what they could last fall?
I use most (but not all) of the College Curriculum for my class. It seems to focus more on designing products whereas I want to include machine design elements.
Brian
If you are referring to our free College Curriculum, that is still (and always will be) free to our Education users here: https://www.onshape.com/edu/college-curriculum
-Noa
Anyone who has paid money for Onshape already knows how to use it, if not, there's no way they would pay money for the premium features before trying the free trials.
I will be excited for the day these tutorials are available to all Onshape members, but for now I'm just confused why anyone given access would use this resource.
Philadelphia User Group Leader
Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
Examples:-
(1) Removing Free Private Documents.
(4) No mid tier account.
(2) Transition from monthly to annual subscriptions.
(3) Hiding training behind pay-wall that you can't even pay to get through.
(4) No mid tier account.
Not trying to cause aggravation, just stating how I see it.
Owen S.
HWM-Water Ltd
I was just thinking that Alibre cost was $395 for 4 cd's containing videos of the software. And I thought that was a bargain compared to $1500 / couple days course cost for SW.
But I do agree with point 2. That one I don't understand and it's somehow against the whole idea of 'renting' the software as you need. I would have understood if they took the price a bit higher for monthly subscription.
As Onshape has clealry shown that their interest is paying customers, they should fix those free accounts so that they can belong to companies and automate the sharing of company owned documents to everyone inside the company. That would lower the step to get more paid licenses for each company. And bring back monthly fee, if company decides to upgrade person X from free to 2 months Pro for project - it is more than likely that when sales rep calls after 6 weeks and makes the offer for extending it to year, both parties will be happy and another license is sold.
I also think it is very important that edu has access to all the tutorials as these are the future CAD users and getting them onto Onshape will cement the future with Cloud CAD. Everyone I have talked to using Onshape at schools absolutely loves it.
Twitter: @onshapetricks & @babart1977
I feel like Onshape would be well served recruiting these future CAD users with more accessible tutorials for edu users (whose school may not be teaching Onshape with the instructor kit) explicitly focusing on the cloud/shared aspect, as outside the enterprise environment, schoolwork is really where people like me see the advantage of simultaneous edits/cloud.
Also, if there hadn't been an edu plan with unlimited documents, I'd have definitely stuck with Solidworks for most of my miscellaneous school needs and definitely would not have got around to developing the FeatureScripts I did.
PhD, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University